Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400365›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Nonlinear Cellular Mechanical Behavior Adaptation to Substrate Mechanics Identified by Atomic Force Microscope.

Keyvan Mollaeian, Yi Liu, Siyu Bi, Yifei Wang, Juan Ren, Meng Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stiffness Sensing by Cells.Physiological reviews · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Keyvan MollaeianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. keyvanm@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8262-4252
Yi LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. yil1@iastate.edu.
Siyu BiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. siyub@iastate.edu.
Yifei WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. yifeiw@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9822-5002
Juan RenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. juanren@iastate.edu.
Meng LuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. menglu@iastate.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation CMMI-1634592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell⁻substrate interaction plays an important role in intracellular behavior and function. Adherent cell mechanics is directly regulated by the substrate mechanics. However, previous studies on the effect of substrate mechanics only focused on the stiffness relation between the substrate and the cells, and how the substrate stiffness affects the time-scale and length-scale of the cell mechanics has not yet been studied. The absence of this information directly limits the in-depth understanding of the cellular mechanotransduction process. In this study, the effect of substrate mechanics on the nonlinear biomechanical behavior of living cells was investigated using indentation-based atomic force microscopy. The mechanical properties and their nonlinearities of the cells cultured on four substrates with distinct mechanical properties were thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, the actin filament (F-actin) cytoskeleton of the cells was fluorescently stained to investigate the adaptation of F-actin cytoskeleton structure to the substrate mechanics. It was found that living cells sense and adapt to substrate mechanics: the cellular Young's modulus, shear modulus, apparent viscosity, and their nonlinearities (mechanical property vs. measurement depth relation) were adapted to the substrates' nonlinear mechanics. Moreover, the positive correlation between the cellular poroelasticity and the indentation remained the same regardless of the substrate stiffness nonlinearity, but was indeed more pronounced for the cells seeded on the softer substrates. Comparison of the F-actin cytoskeleton morphology confirmed that the substrate affects the cell mechanics by regulating the intracellular structure.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalActin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDimethylpolysiloxanesDogsElastic ModulusMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMechanotransduction, CellularMiceMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNIH 3T3 CellsPorosityViscosityActinsbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesAtomic Force Microscopecell mechanics adaptationcytoskeletonsubstrate mechanics

Identifiers

PMID30400365
PMCPMC6274799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.