Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400342›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2018

Is It Possible to Maintain High Compliance with the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol?-A Cohort Study of 400 Consecutive Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Magdalena Pisarska, Natalia Gajewska, Piotr Małczak, Michał Wysocki, Piotr Major, Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Magdalena Pisarska2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. magdalenapisarska@interia.pl.
Natalia Gajewska2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. natgajewska92@gmail.com.
Piotr Małczak2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. pmmalczak@gmail.com.
Michał Wysocki2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. michal92wysocki@gmail.com.
Piotr Major2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. majorpiotr@gmail.com.
Katarzyna Milian-CiesielskaDepartment of Pathology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. kmilianciesielska@gmail.com.
Andrzej Budzyński2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. andrzej.budzynski@uj.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-6470
Michał Pędziwiatr2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 21, 31-501 Kraków, Poland. michal.pedziwiatr@uj.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-2667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the implementation and degree of adherence to the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol in a group of 400 patients operated laparoscopically for colorectal cancer, and to assess its impact on the short-term results. The prospective study included patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic resection from years 2012 to 2017. For the purpose of further analysis, patients were divided into four groups: 100 consecutive patients were in each group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in demographic parameters. The mean compliance with the ERAS protocol in the entire study group was 84.8%. Median adherence differed between the groups 76.9% vs. 92.3% vs. 84.6% vs. 84.6%, respectively (

Indexed as

colorectal cancercompliance with ERAS protocollaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30400342
PMCPMC6262379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.