ArticleCells2018
Inferring Novel Autophagy Regulators Based on Transcription Factors and Non-Coding RNAs Coordinated Regulatory Network.
Article in Cells, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Context-Specific Coordinately Regulatory Network Prioritize Breast Cancer Genetic Risk Factors.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Autophagy is a complex cellular digestion process involving multiple regulators. Compared to post-translational autophagy regulators, limited information is now available about transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators such as transcription factors (TFs) and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). In this study, we proposed a computational method to infer novel autophagy-associated TFs, micro RNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) based on TFs and ncRNAs coordinated regulatory (TNCR) network. First, we constructed a comprehensive TNCR network, including 155 TFs, 681 miRNAs and 1332 lncRNAs. Next, we gathered the known autophagy-associated factors, including TFs, miRNAs and lncRNAs, from public data resources. Then, the random walk with restart (RWR) algorithm was conducted on the TNCR network by using the known autophagy-associated factors as seeds and novel autophagy regulators were finally prioritized. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) produced an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.889. In addition, functional analysis of the top 100 ranked regulators, including 55 TFs, 26 miRNAs and 19 lncRNAs, demonstrated that these regulators were significantly enriched in cell death related functions and had significant semantic similarity with autophagy-related Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Finally, extensive literature surveys demonstrated the credibility of the predicted autophagy regulators. In total, we presented a computational method to infer credible autophagy regulators of transcriptional factors and non-coding RNAs, which would improve the understanding of processes of autophagy and cell death and provide potential pharmacological targets to autophagy-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.