Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400196›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Accuracy and Validity of Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Equations in Middle-Aged Adults.

Francisco J Amaro-Gahete, Lucas Jurado-Fasoli, Alejandro De-la-O, Ángel Gutierrez, Manuel J Castillo, Jonatan R Ruiz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05061797 (A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Study to Examine the Thermogenic Effect of an Energy Drink in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05061797 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Study to Examine the Thermogenic Effect of an Energy Drink in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorRowdy EnergyRan2021 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsMetabolismArmsThermogenic Energy Drink - Active Study Product Formula, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco J Amaro-GaheteDepartment of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. amarof@ugr.es.ORCID 0000-0002-7207-9016
Lucas Jurado-FasoliDepartment of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. juradofasoli@ugr.es.ORCID 0000-0002-5254-1816
Alejandro De-la-ODepartment of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. delao@ugr.es.ORCID 0000-0002-5254-1816
Ángel GutierrezDepartment of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. gutierre@ugr.es.
Manuel J CastilloDepartment of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. mcgarzon@ugr.es.
Jonatan R RuizPromoting Fitness and Health through physical activity research group (PROFITH), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain. ruizj@ugr.es.
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Education FPU14/04172 and FPU15/03960University of Granada Plan Propio de Investigación 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence; Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indirect calorimetry (IC) is considered the reference method to determine the resting energy expenditure (REE), but its use in a clinical context is limited. Alternatively, there is a number of REE predictive equations to estimate the REE. However, it has been shown that the available REE predictive equations could either overestimate or underestimate the REE as measured by IC. Moreover, the role of the weight status in the accuracy and validity of the REE predictive equations requires further attention. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the accuracy and validity of REE predictive equations in normal-weight, overweight, and obese sedentary middle-aged adults. A total of 73 sedentary middle-aged adults (53% women, 40⁻65 years old) participated in the study. We measured REE by indirect calorimetry, strictly following the standard procedures, and we compared it with the values obtained from 33 predictive equations. The most accurate predictive equations in middle-aged sedentary adults were: (i) the equation of FAO/WHO/UNU in normal-weight individuals (50.0% of prediction accuracy), (ii) the equation of Livingston in overweight individuals (46.9% of prediction accuracy), and (iii) the equation of Owen in individuals with obesity (52.9% of prediction accuracy). Our study shows that the weight status plays an important role in the accuracy and validity of different REE predictive equations in middle-aged adults.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityReproducibility of Resultsbasal metabolismenergy balanceindirect calorimetrymetabolic rateobesity

Identifiers

PMID30400196
PMCPMC6266118
OpenAlexW2898875354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.