Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400182›Full record

ArticleViruses2018

Transcriptomics Reveal Antiviral Gene Induction in the Egyptian Rousette Bat Is Antagonized In Vitro by Marburg Virus Infection.

Catherine E Arnold, Jonathan C Guito, Louis A Altamura, Sean P Lovett, Elyse R Nagle, Gustavo F Palacios, Mariano Sanchez-Lockhart, Jonathan S Towner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Viruses and Bats.Viruses · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine E ArnoldCenter for Genome Sciences, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA. catherine.e.arnold13.ctr@mail.mil.ORCID 0000-0002-1635-4941
Jonathan C GuitoViral Special Pathogens Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. ypw1@cdc.gov.
Louis A AltamuraDiagnostic Systems Division, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA. louis.a.altamura2.ctr@mail.mil.
Sean P LovettCenter for Genome Sciences, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA. sean.p.lovett2.ctr@mail.mil.
Elyse R NagleCenter for Genome Sciences, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA. elyse.n.abbott.ctr@mail.mil.
Gustavo F PalaciosCenter for Genome Sciences, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA. Gustavo.f.palacios.ctr@mail.mil.
Mariano Sanchez-LockhartCenter for Genome Sciences, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA. Mariano.sanchez-lockhart.ctr@mail.mil.
Jonathan S TownerViral Special Pathogens Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. jit8@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6473-3049
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Egyptian rousette bat (ERB) is the only known Marburg virus (MARV) reservoir host. ERBs develop a productive MARV infection with low viremia and shedding but no overt disease, suggesting this virus is efficiently controlled by ERB antiviral responses. This dynamic would contrast with humans, where MARV-mediated interferon (IFN) antagonism early in infection is thought to contribute to the severe, often fatal disease. The newly-annotated ERB genome and transcriptome have now enabled us to use a custom-designed NanoString nCounter ERB CodeSet in conjunction with RNA-seq to investigate responses in a MARV-infected ERB cell line. Both transcriptomic platforms correlated well and showed that MARV inhibited the antiviral program in ERB cells, while an IFN antagonism-impaired MARV was less efficient at suppressing the response gene induction, phenotypes previously reported for primate cells. Interestingly, and despite the expansion of IFN loci in the ERB genome, neither MARV showed specific induction of almost any

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsCell LineChiropteraDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, InnateInterferonsMarburgvirusMarburg Virus DiseaseInterferonsEgyptian rousette batMarburg virustranscriptomicsVP35

Identifiers

PMID30400182
PMCPMC6266330
OpenAlexW2900438468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.