Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400154›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS.

Wenan Yuan, Jiating Li, Madhav Bhatta, Yeyin Shi, P Stephen Baenziger, Yufeng Ge

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenan YuanBiological Systems Engineering Department, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA. wenan.yuan@huskers.unl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6300-2973
Jiating LiBiological Systems Engineering Department, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA. jiatingli@huskers.unl.edu.
Madhav BhattaDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA. madhav.bhatta@huskers.unl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4959-0481
Yeyin ShiBiological Systems Engineering Department, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA. yshi18@unl.edu.
P Stephen BaenzigerDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA. pbaenziger1@unl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9109-6954
Yufeng GeBiological Systems Engineering Department, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA. yge2@unl.edu.

Funding

University of Nebraska Foundation ARD Innovation Fund for Wheat/Cereal Crops and Wheat/Cereal Scholarship & Fellowship Support Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the key crop traits, plant height is traditionally evaluated manually, which can be slow, laborious and prone to error. Rapid development of remote and proximal sensing technologies in recent years allows plant height to be estimated in more objective and efficient fashions, while research regarding direct comparisons between different height measurement methods seems to be lagging. In this study, a ground-based multi-sensor phenotyping system equipped with ultrasonic sensors and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) was developed. Canopy heights of 100 wheat plots were estimated five times during a season by the ground phenotyping system and an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the results were compared to manual measurements. Overall, LiDAR provided the best results, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 m and an R² of 0.97. UAS obtained reasonable results with an RMSE of 0.09 m and an R² of 0.91. Ultrasonic sensors did not perform well due to our static measurement style. In conclusion, we suggest LiDAR and UAS are reliable alternative methods for wheat height evaluation.

Indexed as

AircraftOptics and PhotonicsPhenotypePlant LeavesRemote Sensing TechnologyTriticumUltrasonicscropphenotypingplant breedingproximal sensingremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID30400154
PMCPMC6263480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.