Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400145›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Nutrients and Food Groups of Relevance to the Gut Microbiota in Young Children.

Claudia Leong, Rachael W Taylor, Jillian J Haszard, Elizabeth A Fleming, Gerald W Tannock, Ewa A Szymlek-Gay, Sonya L Cameron, Renee Yu, Harriet Carter, Li Kee Chee and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia LeongDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. leocl333@student.otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-6388-4646
Rachael W TaylorDepartment of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. rachael.taylor@otago.ac.nz.
Jillian J HaszardDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. jill.haszard@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-6312-7795
Elizabeth A FlemingDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. liz.fleming@otago.ac.nz.
Gerald W TannockDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. gerald.tannock@otago.ac.nz.
Ewa A Szymlek-GayInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia. ewa.szymlekgay@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-7945
Sonya L CameronDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. sonyalcameron@gmail.com.
Renee YuDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. yure1721@student.otago.ac.nz.
Harriet CarterDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. carha847@student.otago.ac.nz.
Li Kee CheeDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. cheli159@student.otago.ac.nz.
Lucy KennedyDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. lucykennedy@hotmail.co.nz.
Robyn MooreDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. mooro526@student.otago.ac.nz.
Anne-Louise M HeathDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. anne-louise.heath@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-0782
University of Otago · NZCancer Society of New Zealand · NZDeakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary fiber is an important nutrient for the gut microbiota, with different fiber fractions having different effects. The aim of this study was to determine the relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (EAT5 FFQ) for measuring intake of fiber, and low and high fiber foods, in studies examining diet and gut microbiota in young children. One hundred parents of 5-year old children completed the 123-item EAT5 FFQ on two occasions four weeks apart. A 3-day weighed diet record (WDR) was completed on non-consecutive days between FFQ appointments. Mean correlations between the (randomly chosen) FFQ and WDR were acceptable for nutrient and food group intakes (

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeNutrientsAdultChild, PreschoolDiet RecordsDiet SurveysFemaleHumansMaleParentsReproducibility of ResultsNutrientschildrendietary fiberfood frequency questionnairemicrobiotaNew Zealandreproducibilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID30400145
PMCPMC6266661
OpenAlexW2899434830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.