ArticleMedical image analysis2019
A collaborative computer aided diagnosis (C-CAD) system with eye-tracking, sparse attentional model, and deep learning.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Eye Tracking-Enhanced Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review on Data Efficiency, Interpretability, and Multimodal Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Application of the joint clustering algorithm based on Gaussian kernels and differential privacy in lung cancer identification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Use of Machine Learning in Eye Tracking Studies in Medical Imaging: A Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Review
- Aptamer-functionalized MOFs and AI-driven strategies for early cancer diagnosis and therapeutics.Biotechnology letters · 2024Review
- A review of machine learning in scanpath analysis for passive gaze-based interaction.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence for early detection of renal cancer in computed tomography: A review.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
- Machine Learning for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Review
- REFLACX, a dataset of reports and eye-tracking data for localization of abnormalities in chest x-rays.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Deep Learning Application for Analyzing of Constituents and Their Correlations in the Interpretations of Medical Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Diagnosis of Leukaemia in Blood Slides Based on a Fine-Tuned and Highly Generalisable Deep Learning Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Machine learning in patient flow: a review.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2021Review
- Creation and validation of a chest X-ray dataset with eye-tracking and report dictation for AI development.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Integrating Eye Tracking and Speech Recognition Accurately Annotates MR Brain Images for Deep Learning: Proof of Principle.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Development and multicenter validation of chest X-ray radiography interpretations based on natural language processing.Communications medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Deep learning applications in pulmonary medical imaging: recent updates and insights on COVID-19.Machine vision and applications · 2020Article
- Artificial Intelligence and its future potential in lung cancer screening.EXCLI journal · 2020Review
- Eye Tracking for Deep Learning Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of digital imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Computer aided diagnosis (CAD) tools help radiologists to reduce diagnostic errors such as missing tumors and misdiagnosis. Vision researchers have been analyzing behaviors of radiologists during screening to understand how and why they miss tumors or misdiagnose. In this regard, eye-trackers have been instrumental in understanding visual search processes of radiologists. However, most relevant studies in this aspect are not compatible with realistic radiology reading rooms. In this study, we aim to develop a paradigm shifting CAD system, called collaborative CAD (C-CAD), that unifies CAD and eye-tracking systems in realistic radiology room settings. We first developed an eye-tracking interface providing radiologists with a real radiology reading room experience. Second, we propose a novel algorithm that unifies eye-tracking data and a CAD system. Specifically, we present a new graph based clustering and sparsification algorithm to transform eye-tracking data (gaze) into a graph model to interpret gaze patterns quantitatively and qualitatively. The proposed C-CAD collaborates with radiologists via eye-tracking technology and helps them to improve their diagnostic decisions. The C-CAD uses radiologists' search efficiency by processing their gaze patterns. Furthermore, the C-CAD incorporates a deep learning algorithm in a newly designed multi-task learning platform to segment and diagnose suspicious areas simultaneously. The proposed C-CAD system has been tested in a lung cancer screening experiment with multiple radiologists, reading low dose chest CTs. Promising results support the efficiency, accuracy and applicability of the proposed C-CAD system in a real radiology room setting. We have also shown that our framework is generalizable to more complex applications such as prostate cancer screening with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.