Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30399479›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2018

Left-shifting prism adaptation boosts reward-based learning.

Selene Schintu, Michael Freedberg, Zaynah M Alam, Sarah Shomstein, Eric M Wassermann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Selene SchintuBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA; Department of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, USA. Electronic address: selene.schintu@gmail.com.
Michael FreedbergBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, USA.
Zaynah M AlamBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
Sarah ShomsteinDepartment of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, USA.
Eric M WassermannBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
George Washington University · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visuospatial cognition has an inherent lateralized bias. Individual differences in the direction and magnitude of this bias are associated with asymmetrical D2/3 dopamine binding and dopamine system genotypes. Dopamine level affects feedback-based learning and dopamine signaling asymmetry is related to differential learning from reward and punishment. High D2 binding in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for reward. Prism adaptation (PA) is a simple sensorimotor technique, which modulates visuospatial bias according to the direction of the deviation. Left-deviating prism adaptation (LPA) induces rightward bias in healthy subjects. It is therefore possible that the right side of space increases in saliency along with left hemisphere dopaminergic activity. Right-deviating prism adaptation (RPA) has been used mainly as a control condition because it does not modulate behavior in healthy individuals. Since LPA induces a rightward visuospatial bias as a result of left hemisphere modulation, and higher dopaminergic activity in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for rewarding events we hypothesized that LPA would increase the preference for learning with reward. Healthy volunteers performed a computer-based probabilistic classification task before and after LPA or RPA. Consistent with our predictions, PA altered the preference for rewarded versus punished learning, with the LPA group exhibiting increased learning from reward. These results suggest that PA modulates dopaminergic activity in a lateralized fashion.

Indexed as

RewardAdaptation, PhysiologicalCognitionFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansLearningMalePhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung AdultDopamineFeedback learningLine bisectionPrism adaptationPseudoneglect

Identifiers

PMID30399479
PMCPMC7327780
OpenAlexW2897170380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.