Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30399333›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cell2018

A Regeneration Toolkit.

Mayssa H Mokalled, Kenneth D Poss

Abstract readEditorialReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Papilla Stage as a Critical Molecular Transition:Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Myc beyond Cancer: Regulation of Mammalian Tissue Regeneration.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Review
  8. The regeneration-responsive elementFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: From Homeostasis to Tumor Progression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Assessment of Swim Endurance and Swim Behavior in Adult Zebrafish.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The complexity of TGFβ/activin signaling in regeneration.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2021
    Review
  19. Molecular biology of meniscus pathology: Lessons learned from translational studies and mouse models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mayssa H MokalledDepartment of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: mmokalled@wustl.edu.
Kenneth D PossDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Regeneration Next, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: kenneth.poss@duke.edu.

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEART &VASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007101 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FREEDMAN, NEIL J. · 1985 to 2020
$9.8M
Regulation of Myocardial Regeneration in ZebrafishR01HL081674 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2005 to 2019
$6.6M
Regulation of Appendage Regeneration in ZebrafishR01GM074057 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
Identification and application of regulatory elements for heart regenerationR01HL136182 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BLACK, BRIAN L, POSS, KENNETH D · 2017 to 2020
$3.1M
Regulation of the Epicardial Injury Response During Heart Regeneration in ZebrafishR01HL131319 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Regulation of glial bridging during spinal cord regeneration in zebrafishR21NS096617 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2017 to 2018
$437k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081674NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131319NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136182NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007101NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074057NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS096617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of animals to replace injured body parts has been a subject of fascination for centuries. The emerging importance of regenerative medicine has reinvigorated investigations of innate tissue regeneration, and the development of powerful genetic tools has fueled discoveries into how tissue regeneration occurs. Here, we present an overview of the armamentarium employed to probe regeneration in vertebrates, highlighting areas where further methodology advancement will deepen mechanistic findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansRegenerationRegenerative MedicineWound Healinggene editinglineage tracingmicemodel systemssalamandersstem cellstissue regenerationzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID30399333
PMCPMC6373444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.