Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30399174›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Cancer immunotherapy using PolyPurine Reverse Hoogsteen hairpins targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in human tumor cells.

Miriam Marlene Medina Enríquez, Alex J Félix, Carlos J Ciudad, Véronique Noé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Detection of a G-Quadruplex as a Regulatory Element inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriam Marlene Medina EnríquezDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, School of Pharmacy, and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9454-9114
Alex J FélixDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, School of Pharmacy, and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos J CiudadDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, School of Pharmacy, and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Véronique NoéDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, School of Pharmacy, and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7937-8038
Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia de la Universitat de Barcelona

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy approaches stand out as innovative strategies to eradicate tumor cells. Among them, PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is considered one of the most successful advances in the history of cancer immunotherapy. We used our technology of Polypurine reverse Hoogsteen hairpins (PPRHs) for silencing both genes with the aim to provoke the elimination of tumor cells by macrophages in co-culture experiments. Incubation of PPRHs against PD-1 and PD-L1 decreased the levels of mRNA and protein in THP-1 monocytes and PC3 prostate cancer cells, respectively. Viability of THP-1 cells and macrophages obtained by PMA-differentiation of THP-1 cells was not affected upon incubation with the different PPRHs. On the other hand, PC3 cell survival was partially decreased by PPRHs against PD-L1. The greatest effect in decreasing cell viability was obtained in macrophages/PC3 co-culture experiments by combining PPRHs against PD-1 and PD-L1. This effect was also observed in other cancer cell lines: HeLa, SKBR3 and to a minor extent in M21. Apoptosis was not detected when macrophages were treated with the different PPRHs. However, co-cultures of macrophages with the four cancer cell lines treated with PPRHs showed an increase in apoptosis. The order of fold-increase in apoptosis was HeLa > PC3 > SKBR3 > M21. This study demonstrates that PPRHs could be powerful pharmacological agents to use in immunotherapy approaches for the inhibition of PD-1 and PD-L1.

Indexed as

ApoptosisB7-H1 AntigenCell SurvivalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene SilencingHeLa CellsHumansImmunotherapyMaleMonocytesNeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRNA, MessengerRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID30399174
PMCPMC6219785
OpenAlexW2900167232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.