Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30399164›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Telemonitoring system for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis: Usability assessment based on a case study.

Marcos Antonio Martínez García, Martha Socorrro Fernández Rosales, Eduardo López Domínguez, Yesenia Hernández Velázquez, Saúl Domínguez Isidro

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Towards a Model of Big Health Care Data Analytics in Panama: Chronic Kidney Disease.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcos Antonio Martínez GarcíaGeneral Hospital of Zone No. 11,Instituto Méxicano del Seguro Social, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
Martha Socorrro Fernández RosalesGeneral Hospital of Zone No. 11,Instituto Méxicano del Seguro Social, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
Eduardo López DomínguezDepartment of Computer Science, Laboratorio Nacional de Informática Avanzada, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.ORCID 0000-0002-6167-6309
Yesenia Hernández VelázquezDepartment of Computer Science, Laboratorio Nacional de Informática Avanzada, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
Saúl Domínguez IsidroDepartment of Computer Science, Laboratorio Nacional de Informática Avanzada, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two million people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide. In Mexico, it is estimated that by 2025, there will be 212 thousand CKD cases. Among the renal replacement treatments, peritoneal dialysis (PD) exists either in the continuous ambulatory (CAPD) or automated (APD) mode, which requires continuous monitoring and strict control. Thus, several software systems have been proposed to perform reliable remote monitoring of patients using PD but also to achieve the goal with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction; i.e., in software engineering, this is called usability. However, few studies have addressed usability issues using case studies with patients and medical staff in real domains. In this paper, we present a usability assessment of a telemonitoring system for patients with CKD on peritoneal dialysis treatment through a case study with patients and medical staff of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). The usability evaluation was carried out through the application of two satisfaction instruments. These instruments evaluated multiple usability criteria, such as navigability, interactivity, motivation, satisfaction, and applicability. The results obtained from the usability evaluation show that, on average, the services offered by the system have 91.3% acceptance by users (patient-doctors), with the APD and CAPD exchange data registration services having the highest acceptance for patients, with a positive perception of 94.5% and 92.3%, respectively. Meanwhile, for the doctors and nurses, the alarm reception for patients in a risk situation was highest with 95% acceptance. Based on the obtained results, the evaluated telemonitoring system holds wide acceptance, satisfaction, and applicability from patients' and doctors' perspectives. It is also noted that the evaluated system considers and satisfies the requirements and suitable parameters that should be monitored in PD treatment according to studies presented in the literature.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicPeritoneal DialysisTelemedicineAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareProspective StudiesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30399164
PMCPMC6219778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.