Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30399143›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

A decade of vector control activities: Progress and limitations of Chagas disease prevention in a region of Guatemala with persistent Triatoma dimidiata infestation.

Jose G Juarez, Pamela M Pennington, Joe P Bryan, Robert E Klein, Charles B Beard, Elsa Berganza, Nidia Rizzo, Celia Cordon-Rosales

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Phenotypic Analysis of the Anti-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jose G JuarezCenter of Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-478X
Pamela M PenningtonCenter of Biotechnology, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.
Joe P BryanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Central America Regional Office, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Robert E KleinVisiting Investigator, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.
Charles B BeardDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Elsa BerganzaArea de Salud de Jutiapa, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social de Guatemala, Guatemala.
Nidia RizzoCenter of Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.
Celia Cordon-RosalesCenter of Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U51 GH000970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChagas disease, a neglected tropical disease that affects millions of Latin Americans, has been effectively controlled in Guatemala after multiple rounds of indoor residual insecticide spraying (IRS). However, a few foci remain with persistent Triatoma dimidiata infestation. One such area is the municipality of Comapa, Department of Jutiapa, in the southeastern region of Guatemala, where control interventions appear less effective. We carried out three cross sectional entomological and serological surveys in Comapa to evaluate a decade of vector control activities. Baseline serological (1999) and entomological (2001-2) surveys were followed by three rounds of insecticide applications (2003-2005) and intermittent focal spraying of infested houses, until approximately 2012. Household inspections to determine entomological indices and construction materials were conducted in 2001, 2007 and 2011. Seroprevalence surveys were conducted in school-age children in 1999, 2007 and 2015, and in women of child bearing age (15-44 years) only in 2015. After multiple rounds of indoor residual sprayings (IRS), the infestation index decreased significantly from 39% (2001-2) to 27% (2011). Household construction materials alone predicted <10% of infested houses. Chagas seroprevalence in Comapa declined in school-aged children by 10-fold, from 10% (1999) to 1% (2015). However, seroprevalence in women of child bearing age remains >10%.

conclusionAfter a decade of vector control activities in Comapa, there is evidence of significantly reduced transmission. However, the continued risk for vector-borne and congenital transmission pose a threat to the 2022 Chagas disease elimination goal. Systematic integrated vector control and improved Chagas disease screening and treatment programs for congenital and vector-borne disease are needed to reach the elimination goal in regions with persistent vector infestation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsChagas DiseaseFemaleGuatemalaHumansInsect ControlInsecticidesInsect VectorsMaleTriatomaYoung AdultInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID30399143
PMCPMC6239342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.