Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30399061›Full record

ArticleMelanoma research2019

The number and localization of CD68+ and CD163+ macrophages in different stages of cutaneous melanoma.

Satu Salmi, Hanna Siiskonen, Reijo Sironen, Kristiina Tyynelä-Korhonen, Benjamin Hirschovits-Gerz, Mari Valkonen, Päivi Auvinen, Sanna Pasonen-Seppänen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Melanoma research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The tumor immune microenvironment in primary cutaneous melanoma.Archives of dermatological research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. A vascularizedMaterials today. Bio · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Satu SalmiInstitute of Biomedicine.
Hanna SiiskonenDepartment of Dermatology.
Reijo SironenInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Clinical Pathology.
Kristiina Tyynelä-KorhonenCancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland.
Benjamin Hirschovits-GerzInstitute of Biomedicine.
Mari ValkonenInstitute of Biomedicine.
Päivi AuvinenCancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland.
Sanna Pasonen-SeppänenInstitute of Biomedicine.
Institute for Biomedicine · ITUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIFinland University · FIInstitute of Clinical Research · USKuopio University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in cutaneous melanoma is controversial. TAMs include immunogenic and immunosuppressive subtypes, and have distinct functions according to their microanatomical localization. Our aim was to investigate TAMs in benign, premalignant, and malignant melanocytic lesions to determine possible associations with tumor progression and clinicopathological characteristics. In total, 184 tissue samples, including benign and dysplastic nevi, in-situ melanomas, superficial (Breslow's depth <1 mm), and deep (Breslow's depth >4 mm) invasive melanomas and lymph node metastases, were analyzed for macrophage content. Samples were stained immunohistochemically for CD68 and CD163, representing all TAMs and M2-macrophages, respectively. Macrophages were counted by hotspot analysis, and assessed semiquantitatively from the tumor cell nests and stromal component of malignant cases. CD68+ and CD163+ TAMs were more abundant in invasive melanomas compared with benign nevi. The proportion of TAMs in the tumor nests was higher in deep melanomas and lymph node metastases compared with superficially invasive melanomas. High amounts of CD68+ macrophages in tumor cell nests were associated with recurrence, whereas low CD163+ macrophage proportion in tumor stroma was associated with recurrence and in primary melanomas also with poor overall survival. TAMs seem to promote tumor progression in cutaneous melanoma. In particular, CD68+ TAMs and their abundance in tumor nests were associated with poor prognostic factors. However, the correlation of low stromal CD163+ TAM proportion with a poor prognosis indicates that the role of TAMs depends on their subtype and microanatomical localization.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCase-Control StudiesCD163 AntigenCD68 MoleculeChildChild, PreschoolCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMacrophagesAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD163 AntigenCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID30399061
PMCPMC6493694
OpenAlexW2899899538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.