ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2018
Missed Opportunities for Engagement in the Prevention Continuum in a Predominantly Black and Latino Community in New York City.
Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Design Process of a Digital Patient Decision Tool to Increase Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing in the Emergency Department.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Article
- Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier HIV Diagnosis in a Routine Opt-out Testing Environment in Atlanta.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the U.S.: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2024Review
- Adherence to CDC Guidelines for mpox Evaluation: Practice Patterns Across an Academic Medical System During the 2022 Epidemic.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Article
- Using a Structural-Ecological Model to Facilitate Adoption of Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Latinx Sexual Minority Men: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of latinx psychology · 2022Article
- Individualized Provider Feedback Increased HIV and HCV Screening and Identification in a New York City Emergency Department.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2022Article
- Patients, Social Workers, and Pharmacists' Perceptions of Barriers to Providing HIV Care in Community Pharmacies in the United States.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Attitudes and Perceived Barriers to Routine HIV Screening and Provision and Linkage of Postexposure Prophylaxis and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Graduate Medical Trainees.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2021Article
- HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment as Prevention - Beliefs and Access Barriers in Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) and Transgender Women: A Systematic Review.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2020Review
- Intervention Messaging About Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young, Black Sexual Minority Men.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2019Article
- Reasons Why Young Men Who Have Sex with Men Report Not Using HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Perceptions of Burden, Need, and Safety.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2019Article
- Missed opportunities for HIV testing in people diagnosed with HIV, Estonia, 2014 to 2015.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Even though over the last 25 years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for HIV screening have expanded to encompass population-wide screening in all healthcare settings, and despite the availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a large proportion of individuals at risk of infection are not linked to prevention care. We evaluated missed opportunities for HIV screening and linkage to PrEP from 2006 through 2017 at an urban academic medical center serving a predominantly minority community. A missed opportunity for HIV screening was a provider visit that did not include HIV testing and occurred within the 12 months before the first positive HIV test. A missed opportunity for prevention was a visit after 2012 that included a negative HIV test, no evaluation for PrEP, and was followed by a positive HIV test. Univariate analysis was performed to assess characteristics of individuals with missed opportunities for screening and prevention services. Between 2006 and 2017, 721 patients were newly diagnosed with HIV. Two hundred forty-seven diagnoses were made in the early period (2006-2010), 236 in the middle period (2010-2013), and 238 in the late period (2014-2017). Overall 60% of patients had at least one missed opportunity, 36% for HIV screening, and 42% for PrEP. There was no improvement in the rates of individuals with a missed opportunity for HIV screening over time. Ending the HIV epidemic will require concerted efforts to bolster access to testing and ensure that all individuals are offered screening, counseling, and linkage to prevention and care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.