Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30398642›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

Localizing and Classifying Adaptive Targets with Trend Filtered Regression.

Mehreen R Mughal, Michael DeGiorgio

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Accessible, realistic genome simulation with selection using stdpopsim.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. IntroUNET: identifying introgressed alleles via semantic segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehreen R MughalBioinformatics and Genomics at the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Michael DeGiorgioDepartments of Biology and Statistics, Pennsylvania State University,University Park, PA.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Identifying complex modes of adaptation from population-genomic dataR35GM128590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Michael DeGiorgio · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
Computation, Bioinformatics, and Statistics (CBIOS) Training ProgramT32GM102057 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CHIAROMONTE, FRANCESCA, GIRIRAJAN, SANTHOSH · 2013 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128590NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM102057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying genomic locations of natural selection from sequence data is an ongoing challenge in population genetics. Current methods utilizing information combined from several summary statistics typically assume no correlation of summary statistics regardless of the genomic location from which they are calculated. However, due to linkage disequilibrium, summary statistics calculated at nearby genomic positions are highly correlated. We introduce an approach termed Trendsetter that accounts for the similarity of statistics calculated from adjacent genomic regions through trend filtering, while reducing the effects of multicollinearity through regularization. Our penalized regression framework has high power to detect sweeps, is capable of classifying sweep regions as either hard or soft, and can be applied to other selection scenarios as well. We find that Trendsetter is robust to both extensive missing data and strong background selection, and has comparable power to similar current approaches. Moreover, the model learned by Trendsetter can be viewed as a set of curves modeling the spatial distribution of summary statistics in the genome. Application to human genomic data revealed positively selected regions previously discovered such as LCT in Europeans and EDAR in East Asians. We also identified a number of novel candidates and show that populations with greater relatedness share more sweep signals.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesGenome, HumanMachine LearningModels, GeneticComputer SimulationGenetics, PopulationHumansRegression AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID30398642
PMCPMC6409434
OpenAlexW2949153885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.