Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30398612›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2018

Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

James W Montgomery, Julia L Evans, Jamison D Fargo, Sarah Schwartz, Ronald B Gillam

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Verb Vocabulary Supports Event Probability Use in Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James W MontgomeryDivision of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, Athens.
Julia L EvansSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas-Dallas, Richardson.
Jamison D FargoDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan.
Sarah SchwartzDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan.
Ronald B GillamDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan.

Funding

Cognitive Processing and Sentence Comprehension in SLIR01DC010883 · NIDCD · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI EVANS, JULIA L, GILLAM, RONALD B. · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the potential direct and indirect (mediated) influences of 4 cognitive mechanisms we believe are theoretically relevant to canonical and noncanonical sentence comprehension of school-age children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD). Method: One hundred seventeen children with DLD and 117 propensity-matched typically developing (TD) children participated. Comprehension was indexed by children identifying the agent in implausible sentences. Children completed cognitive tasks indexing the latent predictors of fluid reasoning (FLD-R), controlled attention (CATT), complex working memory (cWM), and long-term memory language knowledge (LTM-LK). Results: Structural equation modeling revealed that the best model fit was an indirect model in which cWM mediated the relationship among FLD-R, CATT, LTM-LK, and sentence comprehension. For TD children, comprehension of both sentence types was indirectly influenced by FLD-R (pattern recognition) and LTM-LK (linguistic chunking). For children with DLD, canonical sentence comprehension was indirectly influenced by LTM-LK and CATT, and noncanonical comprehension was indirectly influenced just by CATT. Conclusions: cWM mediates sentence comprehension in children with DLD and TD children. For TD children, comprehension occurs automatically through pattern recognition and linguistic chunking. For children with DLD, comprehension is cognitively effortful. Whereas canonical comprehension occurs through chunking, noncanonical comprehension develops on a word-by-word basis. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7178939.

Indexed as

Child LanguageCognitionComprehensionSemanticsAttentionChildFemaleHumansLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TestsLinguisticsMaleMemory, Short-TermPropensity ScoreUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30398612
PMCPMC6440308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.