Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30398542›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2019

Effect of Intensive Patient Education vs Placebo Patient Education on Outcomes in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Adrian C Traeger, Hopin Lee, Markus Hübscher, Ian W Skinner, G Lorimer Moseley, Michael K Nicholas, Nicholas Henschke, Kathryn M Refshauge, Fiona M Blyth, Chris J Main and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03964389 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of a Single Session of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) on Pain and Psychological Factors in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheRan2022 to 2022Enrolled179ConditionsBack Pain Lower Back ChronicArmsPain Neuroscience Education" (PNE)
NCT04600843 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Patient Education Manual on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patient With Chronic Low Back Pain Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled24ConditionsBack DisorderArmsPhysical therapy with Patient education, Physical Therapy without patient Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Adrian C TraegerNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hopin LeeNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Markus HübscherNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ian W SkinnerNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
G Lorimer MoseleyNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael K NicholasUniversity of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Pain Management Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas HenschkeSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kathryn M RefshaugeFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona M BlythCentre for Education and Research on Ageing, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Chris J MainArthritis Care UK National Primary Care Centre, Keele University, North Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Julia M HushDepartment of Health Professions, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Serigne LoMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
James H McAuleyNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Many patients with acute low back pain do not recover with basic first-line care (advice, reassurance, and simple analgesia, if necessary). It is unclear whether intensive patient education improves clinical outcomes for those patients already receiving first-line care. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of intensive patient education for patients with acute low back pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruited patients from general practices, physiotherapy clinics, and a research center in Sydney, Australia, between September 10, 2013, and December 2, 2015. Trial follow-up was completed in December 17, 2016. Primary care practitioners invited 618 patients presenting with acute low back pain to participate. Researchers excluded 416 potential participants. All of the 202 eligible participants had low back pain of fewer than 6 weeks' duration and a high risk of developing chronic low back pain according to Predicting the Inception of Chronic Pain (PICKUP) Tool, a validated prognostic model. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either patient education or placebo patient education. Interventions: All participants received recommended first-line care for acute low back pain from their usual practitioner. Participants received additional 2 × 1-hour sessions of patient education (information on pain and biopsychosocial contributors plus self-management techniques, such as remaining active and pacing) or placebo patient education (active listening, without information or advice). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity (11-point numeric rating scale) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included disability (24-point Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) at 1 week, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Of 202 participants randomized for the trial, the mean (SD) age of participants was 45 (14.5) years and 103 (51.0%) were female. Retention rates were greater than 90% at all time points. Intensive patient education was not more effective than placebo patient education at reducing pain intensity (3-month mean [SD] pain intensity: 2.1 [2.4] vs 2.4 [2.2]; mean difference at 3 months, -0.3 [95% CI, -1.0 to 0.3]). There was a small effect of intensive patient education on the secondary outcome of disability at 1 week (mean difference, -1.6 points on a 24-point scale [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.1]) and 3 months (mean difference, -1.7 points, [95% CI, -3.2 to -0.2]) but not at 6 or 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance: Adding 2 hours of patient education to recommended first-line care for patients with acute low back pain did not improve pain outcomes. Clinical guideline recommendations to provide complex and intensive support to high-risk patients with acute low back pain may have been premature. Trial Registration: Australian Clinical Trial Registration Number: 12612001180808.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAcute PainAdultAgedFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesPatient Education as TopicPlacebosSingle-Blind MethodPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID30398542
PMCPMC6440280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.