ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2019
Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Polyurethanes in Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam.Polymers · 2022Article
- Applications of the ROS-Responsive Thioketal Linker for the Production of Smart Nanomedicines.Polymers · 2022Review
- Effects of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite concentration and skeletal site on bone and cartilage formation in rats.Acta biomaterialia · 2021Article
- Settable Polymeric Autograft Extenders in a Rabbit Radius Model of Bone Formation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Oxidation-Responsive, Tunable Growth Factor Delivery from Polyelectrolyte-Coated Implants.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Article
- Enhanced stem cell retention and antioxidative protection with injectable, ROS-degradable PEG hydrogels.Biomaterials · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
impact statementThe development of autograft extenders is a significant clinical need in bone tissue engineering. We report new settable poly(thioketal urethane)-based autograft extenders that have bone-like mechanical properties and handling properties comparable to calcium phosphate bone cements. These settable autograft extenders remodeled to form new bone in a biologically stringent intertransverse process model of bone formation that does not heal when treated with calcium phosphate bone void fillers or cements alone. This is the first study to report settable autograft extenders with bone-like strength and handling properties comparable to ceramic bone cements, which have the potential to improve treatment of bone fractures and other orthopedic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.