Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30397856›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2019

Radio-pathological Correlation of 18F-FDG PET in Characterizing Gallbladder Wall Thickening.

Vikas Gupta, K S Vishnu, Thakur D Yadav, Yashwant R Sakaray, Santosh Irrinki, B R Mittal, N Kalra, K Vaiphei

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Hepato-pancreato-biliary tuberculosis: A review.Turkish journal of surgery · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Imaging patterns of wall thickening type of gallbladder cancer.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Carcinosarcoma of gallbladder: A world review.World journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vikas GuptaDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India. vikaspgi@gmail.com.
K S VishnuDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Thakur D YadavDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Yashwant R SakarayDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Santosh IrrinkiDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
B R MittalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
N KalraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
K VaipheiDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThick-walled gallbladder is difficult to characterize on conventional imaging. 18F-FDG PET was used to differentiate benign and malignant wall thickness and compared with histopathology.

methodsThirty patients with gallbladder (GB) wall thickening (focal > 4 mm and diffuse > 7 mm), underwents uspected on  ultrasound, or CT scan, and underwent 18F-FDG PET. Histopathology of the specimen was compared with imaging findings.

resultsThe mean age was 48.22 ± 31.33 years with a M:F 1:4 ratio. Twenty patients had diffuse and 10 had focal thickening. On 18F-FDG PET, lesion was benign in 12, malignant in 13, and indeterminate in 5. Histopathology was malignancy in 12; benign in 18-chronic cholecystitis in 11, xanthogranulomatous in 4, IgG4 related in 2, and polyp in 1. The mean GB wall thickness was 7.79 ± 3.59 mm (10.34 malignant and 6.10 in benign, p = 0.001). At a cutoff of 8.5 mm, the sensitivity and specificity of detecting malignancy was 94% and 67%. The mean SUV uptake was 7.46 (benign 4.51, malignant 14.26, p = 0.0102). At a cutoff of 5.95, the sensitivity and specificity of detecting malignancy was 92% and 79%. For 18F-FDG PET, overall sensitivity was 91%, specificity 79%, PPV 77%, NPV 92%, and diagnostic accuracy was 84%.

conclusion18F-FDG PET is a reliable method of differentiation between benign and malignant thickening of the gallbladder particularly when wall thickness and SUV value is taken into account.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCholecystectomyCholecystitisDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GallbladderGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsCancerCholecystitisGall badderPET CTThickeningXanthogranulomatous

Identifiers

PMID30397856
OpenAlexW2899580306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.