Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30397793›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Comparison of clinical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment for retinopathy of prematurity.

Emine Alyamaç Sukgen, Yusuf Koçluk

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A review on retinopathy of prematurity.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Systemic Cytokines in Retinopathy of Prematurity.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Repeated intravitreal ranibizumab for reactivated retinopathy of prematurity after intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy: vascular development analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emine Alyamaç SukgenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey. esukgen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2315-434X
Yusuf KoçlukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
Adana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the results of ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment in infants with treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the posterior zone.

methodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, the records of the infants, who were treated between January 2015 and June 2017 in a tertiary center for screening and treatment of ROP, were reviewed. Infants who were administered ranibizumab or aflibercept as initial treatment and completed at least 1 year of corrected age were included. The patients were evaluated in terms of regression, progression or recurrence of the disease, vascularization of the peripheral retina, and ocular complication profile in early or late period.

resultsFifty-four eyes of 27 infants who received ranibizumab treatment (ranibizumab group) and 72 eyes of 36 infants who received aflibercept treatment (aflibercept group) were enrolled. The rate of recurrence was 48.1% in ranibizumab group and 13.9% in aflibercept group. The mean recurrence times were at 8.2 ± 0.92 weeks following the injection of ranibizumab and at 14.2 ± 1.03 weeks following the injection of aflibercept. There were significant statistical differences between the groups in the rate of ROP recurrence, the time of recurrence, and the time of vascularization of peripheral retina (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively).

conclusionAlthough both ranibizumab and aflibercept are effective therapies for the treatment of ROP, more frequent and much earlier recurrences can be seen with ranibizumab treatment. Further studies are needed to obtain ideal options for the treatment of ROP.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntravitreal InjectionsMaleRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetinaRetinopathy of PrematurityRetrospective StudiesafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAfliberceptAnti-VEGFIntravitrealRanibizumabRetinopathy of prematurity

Identifiers

PMID30397793
OpenAlexW2900189041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.