ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019
Environmental risk assessment of psychoactive drugs in the aquatic environment.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Z-Drugs in the Environment: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Wastewater remediation of pharmaceuticals with ozone and granular active carbon: a risk-driven approach.Environmental science : water research & technology · 2025Article
- Toxicity of pharmaceutical micropollutants on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) using blood biomarkers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-task aquatic toxicity prediction model based on multi-level features fusion.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Presence, removal, and risks of psychopharmaceuticals in wastewater streams.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2025Article
- Computational investigation of behavioral toxicity syndromes (BTS) of synthetics halosubstituted semicarbazones.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- A New Method for Environmental Risk Assessment of Pollutants Based on Multi-Dimensional Risk Factors.Toxics · 2022Article
- Sensory-Motor Perturbations in Larval Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Brief Developmental Exposure to Fluoxetine Causes Life-Long Alteration of the Brain Transcriptome in Zebrafish.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Toxicity and remediation of pharmaceuticals and pesticides using metal oxides and carbon nanomaterials.Chemosphere · 2021Review
- Review
- Article
- Occurrence of organic micropollutants in an urbanized sub-basin and ecological risk assessment.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2021Article
- Ecological risk assessment (ERA) based on contaminated groundwater to predict potential impacts to a wetland ecosystem.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Micropollutants in treated wastewater.Ambio · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The consumption of psychoactive pharmaceuticals has increased worldwide, and wastewater treatment plants are not able to eliminate them from the effluent. An extensive review was carried out to assess the environmental risk (ERA model) based on secondary data about potential impacts on non-target organisms of seven psychoactive drugs consumed worldwide (alprazolam, bromazepam, citalopram, clonazepam, diazepam, lorazepam, and oxazepam). Risk quotients (RQs) were calculated according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on ERA of Medicinal Products For Human Use based on (i) the predicted and measured environmental concentrations (PEC and MEC, respectively) of the psychoactive drug in surface water, groundwater, and wastewater effluent and (ii) the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) derived from ecotoxicological assays or ECOSAR software. Furthermore, this study reviews and discusses non-standardized ecotoxicity assays, such as sublethal and behavioral effects on different organisms. In total, 903 MEC entries of psychoactive drugs and 162 data on ecotoxicological assays were gathered from the literature survey addressing behavioral effects (115), acute/chronic effects (35), and sublethal effects (12). Citalopram and diazepam were the only substances that are likely to pose an environmental risk (RQ > 1) to surface waters. Even though there is considerable amount of data on behavioral effects of psychoactive drugs to aquatic species, results are currently not integrated into the EMA risk assessment framework. The large amount of data on psychoactive drug concentrations and effects on non-target organisms collected, interpreted, and discussed in the present study should be used as a baseline for future improvement of ERA strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.