Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30397673›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2018

Prevention of pertussis: from clinical trials to Real World Evidence.

S Esposito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Anti-FIM and Anti-FHA Antibodies InhibitFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S EspositoPediatric Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pertussis, a highly contagious infective disease caused by Bordetella pertussis, was in the past very common among newborns and children, causing significant medical, social and economic issues burden, also due to frequent need of hospitalization and high mortality. Following the introduction of vaccines against pertussis, the burden of the disease dramatically decreased, although nowadays, this disease it is still the most widespread among the vaccine preventable ones. First vaccine formulations were composed with whole cell antigen of Bordetella pertussis and were followed by formulations with acellular antigens (PT, FHA, PRN, FIM), that showed to have similar efficacy and less reactogenicity. In particular, all the acellular vaccines, regardless the number of antigenic component included, demonstrated good immunogenicity in clinical trials and high effectiveness in real world evidence studies. Nevertheless, in the recent years it has been notified an increasing number of cases of pertussis. The most recent evidence demonstrated that for an effective control and prevention of pertussis it is necessary to strengthen vaccination coverage among the whole population, providing primary vaccination to newborns and booster in infancy, adolescence and adulthood every 10 years. Finally, vaccination of women at the third trimester of every pregnancy is the most effective intervention to protect the newborn from pertussis in his first months of life, before developing a protective response after the primary vaccination.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicVaccinationBordetella pertussisHumansInfantItalyPopulation SurveillanceWhooping CoughPertussisPertussis preventionPertussis vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30397673
PMCPMC6196371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.