ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2018
Dynamic fluence field modulation for miscentered patients in computed tomography.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Volume-of-interest imaging with dynamic fluence modulation using multiple aperture devices.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional CT image acquisition uses bowtie filters to reduce dose, x-ray scatter, and detector dynamic range requirements. However, accurate patient centering within the bore of the CT scanner takes time and is often difficult to achieve precisely. Patient miscentering combined with a static bowtie filter can result in significant increases in dose, reconstruction noise, and CT number variations, and consequently raise overall exposure requirements. Approaches to estimate the patient position from scout scans and perform dynamic spatial beam filtration during acquisition are developed and applied in physical experiments on a CT test bench using different beam filtration strategies. While various dynamic beam modulation strategies have been developed, we focus on two approaches: (1) a simple approach using attenuation-based beam modulation using a translating bowtie filter and (2) dynamic beam modulation using multiple aperture devices (MADs)-an emerging beam filtration strategy based on binary filtration of the x-ray beam using variable width slits in a high-density beam blocker. Improved dose utilization and more consistent image performance with respect to an unmodulated baseline (static filter) are demonstrated for miscentered objects and dynamic beam filtration in physical experiments. For a homogeneous object miscentered by 4 cm, the dynamic filter reduced the maximum regional noise and dose penalties (compared with a centered object) from 173% to 16% and 42% to 14%, respectively, for a traditional bowtie, 29% to 8% and 24% to 15%, respectively, for a single MAD, and 275% to 11% and 56% to 18%, respectively, for a dual-MAD filter. The proposed methodology has the potential to relax patient centering requirements within the scanner, reduce setup time, and facilitate additional CT dose reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.