Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30397577›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in psychiatry2018

Mobile App Tools for Identifying and Managing Mental Health Disorders in Primary Care.

Joshua C Magee, Sarah Adut, Kevin Brazill, Stephen Warnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Connected Mental Health: Systematic Mapping Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua C MageeMiami University, Department of Psychology, 90 North Patterson Ave., Oxford, OH 45056.
Sarah AdutMiami University, Department of Psychology, 90 North Patterson Ave., Oxford, OH 45056.
Kevin BrazillUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign/Carle Physician Group, Department of Family Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, 611 West Park St., Urbana, IL 61801.
Stephen WarnickUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Department of Family Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, 1150 W. Medical Center Dr., M7300 Med Sci I, SPC 5625, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5625.
Miami University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Text Message Support to Prevent Smoking Relapse in Community Treatment SettingsK23DA037320 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MAGEE, JOSHUA C · 2015 to 2019
$825k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA037320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMental health apps are intriguing yet challenging tools for addressing barriers to treatment in primary care. In the current review, we seek to assist primary care professionals with evaluating and integrating mental health apps into practice. We briefly summarize two leading frameworks for evaluating mental health apps and conduct a systematic review of mental health apps across a variety of areas commonly encountered in primary care. RECENT

findingsExisting frameworks can guide professionals and patients through the process of identifying apps and evaluating dimensions such as privacy and security, credibility, and user experience. For specific apps, several problem areas appear to have relatively more scientific evaluation in the current app landscape, including PTSD, smoking, and alcohol use. Other areas such as eating disorders not only lack evaluation, but contain a significant subset of apps providing potentially harmful advice. SUMMARY: Overall, individuals seeking mental health apps will likely encounter strengths such as symptom tracking and psychoeducational components, while encountering common weaknesses such as insufficient privacy settings and little integration of empirically-supported techniques. While mental health apps may have more promise than ever, significant barriers to finding functional, usable, effective apps remain for health professionals and patients alike.

Indexed as

appsmentalmobileprimary caresmartphonetechnology

Identifiers

PMID30397577
PMCPMC6214367
OpenAlexW2883720495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.