Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30397518›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

Strengthening the quality of paediatric primary care: protocol for the process evaluation of a health systems intervention in South Africa.

Jamie Murdoch, Robyn Curran, Max Bachmann, Eric Bateman, Ruth Vania Cornick, Tanya Doherty, Sandra Claire Picken, Makhosazana Lungile Simelane, Lara Fairall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jamie MurdochSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-3629
Robyn CurranKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Max BachmannNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Eric BatemanKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ruth Vania CornickKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tanya DohertyKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sandra Claire PickenKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2651-5980
Makhosazana Lungile SimelaneKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lara FairallKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R004080/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant reductions in mortality, preventable and treatable conditions remain the leading causes of death in children under five within South Africa. The WHO's Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) programme has been widely implemented to address the most common causes of mortality in children under five. Although effective, limitations in IMCI scope and adherence have emerged. The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) Child guide has been developed to expand on IMCI and address these limitations. It is intended as a clinical decision support tool for health workers with additional systems strengthening components, including active implementation and training strategy to address contextual and organisational factors hindering quality of care for children. Implementation is complex, requiring comprehensive pilot and process evaluation. The PACK Child pilot and feasibility study will sample 10 primary care facilities in the Western Cape Province. Staff will be trained to integrate the PACK Child guide into routine practice. The process evaluation will investigate implementation and health systems components to establish how to optimise delivery, strengthen IMCI principles and factors required to support effective and sustained uptake into everyday practice.

methodsMixed method process evaluation. Qualitative data include interviews with managers, staff, caregivers and policymakers; observations of training, consultations and clinic flow. Quantitative data include training logs and staff questionnaires. Quantitative and qualitative analysis will be integrated to describe study sites and develop explanations for implementation variation. DISCUSSION: The process evaluation will provide the opportunity to document implementation and refine the programme prior to a larger pragmatic trial or scale-up.

Indexed as

child healthhealth systems evaluationother study designpaediatricsprevention strategies

Identifiers

PMID30397518
PMCPMC6203013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.