Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30397287›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

The amount of activating EGFR mutations in circulating cell-free DNA is a marker to monitor osimertinib response.

Marzia Del Re, Paola Bordi, Eleonora Rofi, Giuliana Restante, Simona Valleggi, Roberta Minari, Stefania Crucitta, Elena Arrigoni, Antonio Chella, Riccardo Morganti and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cell-Free DNA: Hope and Potential Application in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marzia Del ReClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Paola BordiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Eleonora RofiClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giuliana RestanteClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Simona ValleggiPneumology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Roberta MinariMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Stefania CrucittaClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elena ArrigoniClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio ChellaPneumology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Riccardo MorgantiSection of Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marcello TiseoMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Iacopo PetriniPneumology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. iacopo.petrini@unipi.it.
Romano DanesiClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may help understand the molecular response to pharmacologic treatment and provide information on dynamics of clonal heterogeneity. Therefore, this study evaluated the correlation between treatment outcome and activating EGFR mutations (act-EGFR) and T790M in cfDNA in patients with advanced NSCLC given osimertinib.

methodsThirty-four NSCLC patients resistant to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs, positive for both act-EGFR and T790M in cfDNA at the time of progression were enrolled in this study. Plasma samples were obtained at osimertinib baseline and after 3 months of therapy; cfDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR and results were expressed as mutant allele frequency (MAF).

resultsAt baseline, act-EGFR MAF was significantly higher than T790M (p < 0.0001). act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR MAF ratio were significantly correlated with disease response (p = 0.02). Cut-off values of act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR ratio of 2.6% and 0.22 were found, respectively. The PFS of patients with act-EGFR MAF of > 2.6% and < 2.6%, were 10 months vs. not reached, respectively (p = 0.03), whereas patients with T790M/act-EGFR ≤ 0.22 had poorer PFS than patients with a value of > 0.22 (6 months vs. not reached, respectively, p = 0.01).

conclusionact-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR MAF ratio are potential markers of outcome in patients treated with osimertinib.

Indexed as

MutationAcrylamidesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell-Free Nucleic AcidsErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansIndolesLung NeoplasmsMalePyrimidinesAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID30397287
PMCPMC6251035
OpenAlexW2898641367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.