ArticleScientific reports2018
Enhanced microbubble contrast agent oscillation following 250 kHz insonation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustically Activatable Drug-Loaded Nanodroplets for Mechanochemical Therapy in Solid Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Dual-Frequency Ultrasound Enhances Cavitation of Microdroplets for Controlled Scaffold Porosity in Tissue Engineering.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Progress and potential of nanobubbles for ultrasound-mediated drug delivery.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2025Review
- Volumetric Nanodroplet-Enhanced Ultrasound Surgery Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition as a Cancer Therapy Platform.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- The Compression-Dominated Ultrasound Response of Poly(ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Dynamic Damage of Endothelial Cellular Networks Under Ultrasound Cavitation.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2025Article
- Volumetric Passive Acoustic Mapping and Cavitation Detection of Nanobubbles under Low-Frequency Insonation.ACS materials Au · 2025Article
- Low-intensity ultrasound lysis of amyloid microclots in a lab-on-chip model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Innovative Approaches to Brain Cancer: The Use of Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound in Glioma Therapy.Cancers · 2024Review
- Protocol to assess extravasation of fluorescent molecules in mice after ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.STAR protocols · 2024Article
- Diameter-dependent assessment of microvascular leakage following ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.iScience · 2023Article
- Endogenous Neural Stem Cell Activation after Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A transducer positioning method for transcranial focused ultrasound treatment of brain tumors.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Efficacy optimization of low frequency microbubble-mediated sonoporation as a drug delivery platform to cancer cells.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2022Article
- Development of an ultrasound guided focused ultrasound system for 3D volumetric low energy nanodroplet-mediated histotripsy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Perspective on ultrasound bioeffects and possible implications for continuous post-dive monitoring safety.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2022Review
- Acoustically Detonated Microbubbles Coupled with Low Frequency Insonation: Multiparameter Evaluation of Low Energy Mechanical Ablation.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2022Article
- Numerical Evaluation of the Effects of Transducer Displacement on Transcranial Focused Ultrasound in the Rat Brain.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Enhanced thrombolysis by endovascular low-frequency ultrasound with bifunctional microbubbles in venous thrombosis:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Harnessing ultrasound-stimulated phase change contrast agents to improve antibiotic efficacy against methicillin-resistantBiofilm · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbubble contrast agents are widely used in ultrasound imaging and therapy, typically with transmission center frequencies in the MHz range. Currently, an ultrasound center frequency near 250 kHz is proposed for clinical trials in which ultrasound combined with microbubble contrast agents is applied to open the blood brain barrier, since at this low frequency focusing through the human skull to a predetermined location can be performed with reduced distortion and attenuation compared to higher frequencies. However, the microbubble vibrational response has not yet been carefully evaluated at this low frequency (an order of magnitude below the resonance frequency of these contrast agents). In the past, it was assumed that encapsulated microbubble expansion is maximized near the resonance frequency and monotonically decreases with decreasing frequency. Our results indicated that microbubble expansion was enhanced for 250 kHz transmission as compared with the 1 MHz center frequency. Following 250 kHz insonation, microbubble expansion increased nonlinearly with increasing ultrasonic pressure, and was accurately predicted by either the modified Rayleigh-Plesset equation for a clean bubble or the Marmottant model of a lipid-shelled microbubble. The expansion ratio reached 30-fold with 250 kHz at a peak negative pressure of 400 kPa, as compared to a measured expansion ratio of 1.6 fold for 1 MHz transmission at a similar peak negative pressure. Further, the range of peak negative pressure yielding stable cavitation in vitro was narrow (~100 kPa) for the 250 kHz transmission frequency. Blood brain barrier opening using in vivo transcranial ultrasound in mice followed the same trend as the in vitro experiments, and the pressure range for safe and effective treatment was 75-150 kPa. For pressures above 150 kPa, inertial cavitation and hemorrhage occurred. Therefore, we conclude that (1) at this low frequency, and for the large oscillations, lipid-shelled microbubbles can be approximately modeled as clean gas microbubbles and (2) the development of safe and successful protocols for therapeutic delivery to the brain utilizing 250 kHz or a similar center frequency requires consideration of the narrow pressure window between stable and inertial cavitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.