Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30397244›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Comparison of cell-based assays to quantify treatment effects of anticancer drugs identifies a new application for Bodipy-L-cystine to measure apoptosis.

Nita Kumar, Rayhaneh Afjei, Tarik F Massoud, Ramasamy Paulmurugan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Programmed cell death detection methods: a systematic review and a categorical comparison.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain physiome: A concept bridgingBioactive materials · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nita KumarCellular Pathway Imaging Laboratory (CPIL), Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA.
Rayhaneh AfjeiLaboratory of Experimental and Molecular Neuroimaging (LEMNI), Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Grant S-031, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Tarik F MassoudLaboratory of Experimental and Molecular Neuroimaging (LEMNI), Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Grant S-031, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Ramasamy PaulmuruganCellular Pathway Imaging Laboratory (CPIL), Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA. paulmur8@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Therapeutic miRNA Modulation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Ultrasound Guided Drug DeliveryR01CA209888 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAHL, JEREMY, PAULMURUGAN, RAMASAMY · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
CANARY CANCER RESEARCH EDUCATION SUMMER TRAINING (CANARY CREST) PROGRAMR25CA217729 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Utkan DEMIRCI, Sharon Pitteri · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
3D Passive Cavitation Imaging-Guided Therapeutic Delivery of MicroRNA into CancerR21EB022298 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PAULMURUGAN, RAMASAMY · 2016 to 2017
$441k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA209888NCI NIH HHS R25 CA217729NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based assays that measure anticancer drug effects are essential for evaluating chemotherapeutic agents. Many assays targeting various cellular mechanisms are available, leading to inconsistent results when using different techniques. We critically compared six common assays, as well as a new assay using Bodipy.FL.L-cystine (BFC), to identify the most accurate and reproducible in measuring anticancer drug effects. We tested three common chemotherapies (methotrexate, paclitaxel, and etoposide) in two cell lines (Ln229 and MDA-MB231). Spectroscopic assays such as Cell Titer Blue, and 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) yielded a strong drug dose response, especially for paclitaxel and etoposide (R

Indexed as

Amino Acid Transport Systems, AcidicAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBoron CompoundsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCystineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansTime FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Amino Acid Transport Systems, AcidicAntineoplastic AgentsBODIPY-FL L-cystineBoron CompoundsCystineTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID30397244
PMCPMC6218539
OpenAlexW2899069230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.