ArticleScientific reports2018
Timing variability of sensorimotor integration during vocalization in individuals who stutter.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sensorimotor Simulation's Influence on Stress: EEG and Autonomic Responses in Digital Interviews.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Test-Retest Reliability of Behavioral Assays of Feedforward and Feedback Auditory-Motor Control of Voice and Articulation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Mirrors and toothaches: commonplace manipulations of non-auditory feedback availability change perceived speech intelligibility.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Auditory feedback control in adults who stutter during metronome-paced speech I. Timing Perturbation.Journal of fluency disorders · 2023Article
- Auditory feedback control in adults who stutter during metronome-paced speech II. Formant Perturbation.Journal of fluency disorders · 2022Article
- Tract profiles of the cerebellar peduncles in children who stutter.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Structural brain network topological alterations in stuttering adults.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Responses to Auditory Feedback Manipulations in Speech May Be Affected by Previous Exposure to Auditory Errors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- The Role of Sensory Feedback in Developmental Stuttering: A Review.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Review
- Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- It's About Time: Minimizing Hardware and Software Latencies in Speech Research With Real-Time Auditory Feedback.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Coarticulatory Aspects of the Fluent Speech of French and Italian People Who Stutter Under Altered Auditory Feedback.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Neural Correlates of Vocal Pitch Compensation in Individuals Who Stutter.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Adults who stutter and metronome synchronization: evidence for a nonspeech timing deficit.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019Article
- Theta Modulated Neural Phase Coherence Facilitates Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- White matter correlates of sensorimotor synchronization in persistent developmental stuttering.Journal of communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Persistent developmental stuttering affects close to 1% of adults and is thought to be a problem of sensorimotor integration. Previous research has demonstrated that individuals who stutter respond differently to changes in their auditory feedback while speaking. Here we explore a number of changes that accompany alterations in the feedback of pitch during vocal production. Participants sustained the vowel /a/ while hearing on-line feedback of their own voice through headphones. In some trials, feedback was briefly shifted up or down by 100 cents to simulate a vocal production error. As previously shown, participants compensated for the auditory pitch change by altering their vocal production in the opposite direction of the shift. The average compensatory response was smaller for adults who stuttered than for adult controls. Detailed analyses revealed that adults who stuttered had fewer trials with a robust corrective response, and that within the trials showing compensation, the timing of their responses was more variable. These results support the idea that dysfunctional sensorimotor integration in stuttering is characterized by timing variability, reflecting reduced coupling of the auditory and speech motor systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.