Comparison of Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine-Midazolam and Isoflurane for Anesthesia of Black-tailed Prairie Dogs (

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Anesthetic Effects of Intramuscular Alfaxalone-Ketamine in Naked Mole Rats (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
   Article
2. Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Gabapentin after Oral and Subcutaneous Administration in Black-tailed Prairie Dogs (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
   Article
3. Evaluation of dexmedetomidine anesthesia-related temperature changes: preliminary retrospective observational study.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
   Observational

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as