ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2018
The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two Decades of Progress and Remaining Challenges: Comparative Analysis of Rare Disease Policy Implementation in Bulgaria, Romania, and Greece.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Access to orphan drugs in adults with inherited metabolic diseases in Switzerland: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Optimizing Patient Access to Orphan Medicinal Products: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe.Journal of market access & health policy · 2025Article
- Challenges in evaluation and reimbursement of drugs for rare diseases in Saudi Arabia: a Delphi expert consensus.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Mapping challenges in the accessibility of treatment products for urea cycle disorders: A survey of European healthcare professionals.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
- Budget Impact of Disease-Modifying Treatments and a CRISPR Gene-Edited Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Article
- Review
- Strategic discussion on funding and access to therapies targeting rare diseases in Spain: an expert consensus paper.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Article
- The challenges of access to innovative medicines with limited evidence in the European Union.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Should Hungary Pay More for a QALY Gain than Higher-Income Western European Countries?Applied health economics and health policy · 2022Article
- The Awareness of Rare Diseases Among Medical Students and Practicing Physicians in the Republic of Kazakhstan. An Exploratory Study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- How Can We Optimize the Value Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs for Reimbursement Purposes? A Qualitative Interview Study Across European Countries.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Real-world use of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in rare disease (RD) patients: A population-based registry study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Pharmacotherapeutic Patterns and Patients' Access to Pharmacotherapy for Some Rare Diseases in Bulgaria - A Pilot Comparative Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Knowledge and Attitudes of Future Healthcare Professionals Toward Rare Diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Development and Use of Gene Therapy Orphan Drugs-Ethical Needs for a Broader Cooperation Between the Pharmaceutical Industry and Society.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunding of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) is an increasing challenge in the European Union (EU).
objectivesTo identify the different methods for public funding of OMPs in order to map the availability for rare disease patients, as well as to compare the public expenditures on OMPs in 8 EU member states.
methodsInformation on the reimbursement status of 83 OMPs was collected in 8 countries by distinguishing standard and special reimbursements. In two consecutive years, the total public expenditures on OMPs were calculated by using annual EUR exchange rates. Annual total public expenditures were calculated per capita, and as a proportion of GDP, total public pharmaceutical and healthcare budgets. Differences between countries were compared by calculating the deviations from the average spending of countries.
resultsIn 2015 29.4-92.8% of the 83 OMPs were available with any kind of public reimbursement in participant countries including special reimbursement on an individual basis. In Austria, Belgium and France more OMPs were accessible for patients with public reimbursement than in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Standard reimbursement through retail pharmacies and/or hospitals was applied from 0 to 41% of OMPs. The average annual total public expenditure ranged between 1.4-23.5 €/capita in 2013 and 2014. Higher income countries spent more OMPs in absolute terms. Participant countries spent 0.018-0.066% of their GDPs on funding OMPs. Average expenditures on OMPs were ranged between 2.25-6.51% of the public pharmaceutical budget, and 0.44-0.96% of public healthcare expenditures.
conclusionsStandard and special reimbursement techniques play different roles in participant countries. The number of accessible OMPs indicated an equity gap between Eastern and Western Europe. The spending on OMPs as a proportion of GDP, public pharmaceutical and healthcare expenditure was not higher in lower income countries, which indicates substantial differences in patient access to OMPs in favour of higher-income countries. Equity in access for patients with rare diseases is an important policy objective in each member state of the EU; however, equity in access should be harmonized at the European level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.