Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30396318›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of STD & AIDS2019

Acceptability and efficacy of partner notification for curable sexually transmitted infections in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.

Sophia Taleghani, Dvora Joseph-Davey, Scott B West, Henry J Klausner, Adriane Wynn, Jeffrey D Klausner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A review onSouthern African journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophia Taleghani1 Department of Infectious Disease, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-6994
Dvora Joseph-Davey1 Department of Infectious Disease, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Scott B West4 Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Henry J Klausner5 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Adriane Wynn6 University of California Global Health Institute (GloCal), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jeffrey D Klausner1 Department of Infectious Disease, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USColumbia University · USCornell University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

University of California Launching Future Leaders in Global Health Research Training ProgramD43TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIG R COHEN, Sung-Jae Lee · 2017 to 2026
$14.7M
Postdoctoral Training in Global AIDS Prevention ResearchT32MH080634 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JESSE LAWTON CLARK, Pamina Mae Gorbach · 2007 to 2026
$6.4M
Evaluation of pre-exposure prophylaxis cascade in pregnant and breastfeeding women in Cape Town, South AfricaK01TW011187 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOSEPH DAVEY, DVORA LEAH · 2018 to 2022
$698k
Pilot Study of STI Screening and Treatment for PMTCTR21HD084274 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KLAUSNER, JEFFREY DAVID, MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2015 to 2016
$352k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009343FIC NIH HHS K01 TW011187NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH080634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive case management of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) includes partner notification. We reviewed the recent literature evaluating the acceptability and efficacy of partner notification strategies (i.e. direct patient referral, provider referral, or expedited partner treatment) for curable STIs in sub-Saharan Africa. We conducted a systematic search following PRISMA guidelines: published January 2008 to June 2017 in the English language, study in sub-Saharan Africa, and discussion of any curable STI with an outcome on partner notification. We searched six electronic databases, conference abstracts, online clinical trial registries, and article bibliographies. The results showed that out of the 74 identified articles, 55 did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the 11 studies evaluating direct patient referral, the proportion of index cases ( n = 4163) who successfully notified sex partner(s) was 53% (range 23-95%). Among those who notified ( n = 1727), 25% (range 0-77%) had partner(s) that sought evaluation (95% CI 0.51-0.54; 95% CI 0.23-0.27). Both provider referral and expedited partner treatment had higher proportions of partner(s) who sought treatment ( n = 208, 69% and n = 44, 84%, respectively). Direct patient referral is the most commonly used and evaluated partner notification strategy for STIs in sub-Saharan Africa with mixed success. We recommend future research to investigate other strategies such as expedited partner treatment.

Indexed as

Africa South of the SaharaChlamydia InfectionsContact TracingFemaleGonorrheaHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSexually Transmitted DiseasesSexual PartnersAfricabacterial diseaseChlamydia ()Gonorrhea ()protozoal diseasetrichomoniasis ()

Identifiers

PMID30396318
PMCPMC6441466
OpenAlexW2899614884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.