ArticleAnalytical chemistry2018
Peak-Tracking Algorithm for Use in Automated Interpretive Method-Development Tools in Liquid Chromatography.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Article
- Recent applications of chemometrics in one- and two-dimensional chromatography.Journal of separation science · 2020Review
- Characterization of Dye Extracts from Historical Cultural-Heritage Objects Using State-of-the-Art Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry with Active Modulation and Optimized Shifting Gradients.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Recent Developments in Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: Fundamental Improvements for Practical Applications.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A peak-tracking algorithm for chromatograms recorded using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry was developed. Peaks are tracked across chromatograms using the spectrometric information, the statistical moments of the chromatographic peaks, and the relative retention. The algorithm can be applied to pair chromatographic peaks in two very different chromatograms, obtained for different samples using different methods. A fast version of the algorithm was specifically tailored to process chromatograms obtained during method development or optimization, where a few similar mobile-phase-composition gradients (same eluent components, but different ranges and programming rates) are applied to the same sample for the purpose of obtaining model parameters to describe the retention of sample components. Due to the relative similarity between chromatograms, time-saving preselection protocols can be used to locate a candidate peak in another chromatogram. The algorithm was applied to two different samples featuring isomers. The automatically tracked peaks and the resulting retention parameters generally yielded prediction errors of less than 1%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.