Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30395923›Full record

SynthesisNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2019

Regular cannabis use is associated with altered activation of central executive and default mode networks even after prolonged abstinence in adolescent users: Results from a complementary meta-analysis.

Grace Blest-Hopley, Vincent Giampietro, Sagnik Bhattacharyya

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The role of subcortical brain tissue iron as an indicator of dopamine neurophysiology in adolescent cannabis use.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Chronic ΔNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Cannabis in the Development of Psychosis.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Neurocognitive Effects of Cannabis Across the Lifespan.Current behavioral neuroscience reports · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Alcohol and Cannabis Use and the Developing Brain.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace Blest-HopleyDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Vincent GiampietroDepartment of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, PO Box 089, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Sagnik BhattacharyyaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, Camberwell, London, UK. Electronic address: sagnik.2.bhattacharyya@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-CS-011-001Medical Research Council MC_PC_14105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether the effects of cannabis use on brain function persist or recover following abstinence remains unclear. Therefore, using meta-analytic techniques, we examined whether functional alterations measured using fMRI persist in cannabis users abstinent for over 25 days (or 600 h) as evidence suggests that the effects on cognitive performance no longer persist beyond this period. Systematic literature search identified 20 studies, of which, 12 examined current cannabis users (CCU) (361 CCU versus 394 non-cannabis using controls (NU)) and 3 examined abstinent cannabis users (ACU) in 5 separate comparisons (98 ACU versus 106 NU). Studies in ACU were carried out in adolescents and suggest significantly greater activation in components of the central executive and default mode networks in adolescent ACU compared to NU. While this evidence is to be interpreted with caution because studies were carried out in overlapping samples, they indicate a pressing need for independent confirmation whether certain neurofunctional alterations in adolescent cannabis users may persist even after cannabis and its metabolites are likely to have left their bodies.

Indexed as

Marijuana UseAdolescentBrainCannabisExecutive FunctionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMarijuana AbuseNeural PathwaysAbstinenceCannabisFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMeta-analysisTHC

Identifiers

PMID30395923
PMCPMC6331661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.