Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30395602›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

A variably imprinted epiallele impacts seed development.

Daniela Pignatta, Katherine Novitzky, P R V Satyaki, Mary Gehring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome-wide CG hypomethylation of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-Wide Characterization of Wholly Disordered Proteins inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Parental dialectic: Epigenetic conversations in endosperm.Current opinion in plant biology · 2024
    Review
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniela PignattaWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Katherine NovitzkyWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-7273
P R V SatyakiWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5035-7652
Mary GehringWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2280-1522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution of epigenetic variation to phenotypic variation is unclear. Imprinted genes, because of their strong association with epigenetic modifications, represent an opportunity for the discovery of such phenomena. In mammals and flowering plants, a subset of genes are expressed from only one parental allele in a process called gene imprinting. Imprinting is associated with differential DNA methylation and chromatin modifications between parental alleles. In flowering plants imprinting occurs in a seed tissue - endosperm. Proper endosperm development is essential for the production of viable seeds. We previously showed that in Arabidopsis thaliana intraspecific imprinting variation is correlated with naturally occurring DNA methylation polymorphisms. Here, we investigated the mechanisms and function of allele-specific imprinting of the class IV homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-ZIP) transcription factor HDG3. In imprinted strains, HDG3 is expressed primarily from the methylated paternally inherited allele. We manipulated the methylation state of endogenous HDG3 in a non-imprinted strain and demonstrated that methylation of a proximal transposable element is sufficient to promote HDG3 expression and imprinting. Gain of HDG3 imprinting was associated with earlier endosperm cellularization and changes in seed weight. These results indicate that epigenetic variation alone is sufficient to explain imprinting variation and demonstrate that epialleles can underlie variation in seed development phenotypes.

Indexed as

AllelesEpigenesis, GeneticGenomic Imprinting5' Untranslated RegionsDNA MethylationEndospermGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenetic VariationInverted Repeat SequencesMutationPhenotypePlant DevelopmentSeeds5' Untranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID30395602
PMCPMC6237401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.