Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30395576›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Data-driven, voxel-based analysis of brain PET images: Application of PCA and LASSO methods to visualize and quantify patterns of neurodegeneration.

Ivan S Klyuzhin, Jessie F Fu, Andy Hong, Matthew Sacheli, Nikolay Shenkov, Michele Matarazzo, Arman Rahmim, A Jon Stoessl, Vesna Sossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Molecular connectivity studies in neurotransmission: a scoping review.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Driver Countries in Global Banking Network.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivan S KlyuzhinDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0141-7628
Jessie F FuDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Andy HongDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-6866
Matthew SacheliPacific Parkinson's Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nikolay ShenkovDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michele MatarazzoPacific Parkinson's Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-8667
Arman RahmimDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
A Jon StoesslPacific Parkinson's Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Vesna SossiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 125989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial patterns of radiotracer binding in positron emission tomography (PET) images may convey information related to the disease topology. However, this information is not captured by the standard PET image analysis that quantifies the mean radiotracer uptake within a region of interest (ROI). On the other hand, spatial analyses that use more advanced radiomic features may be difficult to interpret. Here we propose an alternative data-driven, voxel-based approach to spatial pattern analysis in brain PET, which can be easily interpreted. We apply principal component analysis (PCA) to identify voxel covariance patterns, and optimally combine several patterns using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The resulting models predict clinical disease metrics from raw voxel values, allowing for inclusion of clinical covariates. The analysis is performed on high-resolution PET images from healthy controls and subjects affected by Parkinson's disease (PD), acquired with a pre-synaptic and a post-synaptic dopaminergic PET tracer. We demonstrate that PCA identifies robust and tracer-specific binding patterns in sub-cortical brain structures; the patterns evolve as a function of disease progression. Principal component LASSO (PC-LASSO) models of clinical disease metrics achieve higher predictive accuracy compared to the mean tracer binding ratio (BR) alone: the cross-validated test mean squared error of adjusted disease duration (motor impairment score) was 16.3 ± 0.17 years2 (9.7 ± 0.15) with mean BR, versus 14.4 ± 0.18 years2 (8.9 ± 0.16) with PC-LASSO. We interpret the best-performing PC-LASSO models in the spatial sense and discuss them with reference to the PD pathology and somatotopic organization of the striatum. PC-LASSO is thus shown to be a useful method to analyze clinically-relevant tracer binding patterns, and to construct interpretable, imaging-based predictive models of clinical metrics.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrainCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLeast-Squares AnalysisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve DegenerationNeuroimagingParkinson DiseasePattern Recognition, AutomatedPositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID30395576
PMCPMC6218048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.