Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30395571›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A new bioabsorbable polymer film to prevent peritoneal adhesions validated in a post-surgical animal model.

Lucie Allègre, Isabelle Le Teuff, Salomé Leprince, Sophie Warembourg, Hubert Taillades, Xavier Garric, Vincent Letouzey, Stephanie Huberlant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Intraperitoneal Lavage withOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021
    Article
  13. Biomaterials to Prevent Post-Operative Adhesion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie AllègreDepartment of gynecology and obstetrics, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0384-0657
Isabelle Le TeuffDepartment of gynecology and obstetrics, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Salomé LeprinceDepartment of Artificial Polymers, Max Mousseron Institute of Biomolecules, CNRS UMR 5247, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France.
Sophie WarembourgDepartment of gynecology and obstetrics, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Hubert TailladesSurgical and Experimental Department, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Xavier GarricDepartment of Artificial Polymers, Max Mousseron Institute of Biomolecules, CNRS UMR 5247, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France.
Vincent LetouzeyDepartment of gynecology and obstetrics, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Stephanie HuberlantDepartment of gynecology and obstetrics, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal adhesions are a serious surgical postoperative complication. The aim of this study is to investigate, in a rat model, the anti-adhesive effects of a bioabsorbable film of polymer combining polyethylene glycol and polylactic acid. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-three animals were randomized into five groups according to the anti-adhesion treatment: Hyalobarrier®, Seprafilm®, Polymer A (PA), Polymer B (PB), and control. The rats were euthanized on days 5 and 12 to evaluate the extent, severity and degree of adhesions and histopathological changes. Three animals were euthanized at day 2 in PA, PB and control groups to observe the in vivo elimination.

resultsMacroscopic adhesion formation was significantly lower in the PA group than in the control group at day 5 (median adhesion score 0±0 vs 9.6 ±0.5 p = 0.002) and at day 12 (0±0 vs 7.3±4 p = 0.02). Furthermore, median adhesion score at day 5 was significantly lower in the PA group than in the Seprafilm group (0±0 vs 4.2± 3.9 p = 0.03). Residence time of PA seems longer than PB.

conclusionThe PA bioabsorbable film seems efficient in preventing the formation of peritoneal adhesions.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialAnimalsBiodegradable PlasticsDisease Models, AnimalFemalePeritoneumPolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsRatsTissue AdhesionsBiodegradable PlasticsMembranes, ArtificialPolyestersPolyethylene Glycolspoly(lactide)

Identifiers

PMID30395571
PMCPMC6218020
OpenAlexW2899839828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.