Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30395211›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2018

Aequatus: an open-source homology browser.

Anil S Thanki, Nicola Soranzo, Javier Herrero, Wilfried Haerty, Robert P Davey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anil S ThankiEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Nicola SoranzoEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Javier HerreroEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Wilfried HaertyEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
Robert P DaveyEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000GP006Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR5885Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9814Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Phylogenetic information inferred from the study of homologous genes helps us to understand the evolution of genes and gene families, including the identification of ancestral gene duplication events as well as regions under positive or purifying selection within lineages. Gene family and orthogroup characterization enables the identification of syntenic blocks, which can then be visualized with various tools. Unfortunately, currently available tools display only an overview of syntenic regions as a whole, limited to the gene level, and none provide further details about structural changes within genes, such as the conservation of ancestral exon boundaries amongst multiple genomes. Findings: We present Aequatus, an open-source web-based tool that provides an in-depth view of gene structure across gene families, with various options to render and filter visualizations. It relies on precalculated alignment and gene feature information typically held in, but not limited to, the Ensembl Compara and Core databases. We also offer Aequatus.js, a reusable JavaScript module that fulfills the visualization aspects of Aequatus, available within the Galaxy web platform as a visualization plug-in, which can be used to visualize gene trees generated by the GeneSeqToFamily workflow.

Indexed as

SoftwareComputational BiologyGenomeGenomicsInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetPhylogenyProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID30395211
PMCPMC6251984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.