Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30395188›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Selective Role of the Putamen in Serial Reversal Learning in the Marmoset.

Stacey A W Jackson, Nicole K Horst, Sebastian F A Axelsson, Naotaka Horiguchi, Gemma J Cockcroft, Trevor W Robbins, Angela C Roberts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cognitive Inflexibility in OCD and Related Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dorsolateral striatum engagement during reversal learning.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey A W JacksonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Nicole K HorstDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Sebastian F A AxelssonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Naotaka HoriguchiDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Gemma J CockcroftBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
Angela C RobertsBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council MR/J012084/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104631/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fronto-striatal circuitry involving the orbitofrontal cortex has been identified as mediating successful reversal of stimulus-outcome contingencies. The region of the striatum that most contributes to reversal learning remains unclear, with studies in primates implicating both caudate nucleus and putamen. We trained four marmosets on a touchscreen-based serial reversal task and implanted each with cannulae targeting both putamen and caudate bilaterally. This allowed reversible inactivation of the two areas within the same monkeys, but across separate sessions, to directly investigate their respective contributions to reversal performance. Behavioral sensitivity to the GABAA agonist muscimol varied across subjects and between brain regions, so each marmoset received a range of doses. Intermediate doses of intra-putamen muscimol selectively impaired reversal performance, leaving the baseline discrimination phase unchanged. There was no effect of low doses and high doses were generally disruptive. By contrast, low doses of intra-caudate muscimol improved reversal performance, while high doses impaired both reversal and baseline discrimination performance. These data provide evidence for a specific role of the putamen in serial reversal learning, which may reflect the more habitual nature of repeated reversals using the same stimulus pair.

Indexed as

AnimalsCallithrixDiscrimination LearningMalePhotic StimulationPutamenReversal Learning

Identifiers

PMID30395188
PMCPMC6294407
OpenAlexW2905176179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.