Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30395159›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019

Quantitative lymph node burden as a 'very-high-risk' factor identifying head and neck cancer patients benefiting from postoperative chemoradiation.

Z S Zumsteg, M Luu, S Kim, M Tighiouart, A Mita, K S Scher, D J Lu, S L Shiao, J Mallen-St Clair, A S Ho

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Redefining high-risk extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: beyond the minor-major dichotomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Number of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio predict recurrence and survival in hypopharyngeal cancer based on SEER database and validation of real-world data.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Predictive Value ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microscopic Extranodal Extension in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer and the Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiation.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Z S ZumstegSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Departments of Radiation Oncology. Electronic address: zachary.zumsteg@cshs.org.
M LuuSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics.
S KimSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics.
M TighiouartSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics.
A MitaSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine.
K S ScherSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine.
D J LuSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Departments of Radiation Oncology.
S L ShiaoSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Departments of Radiation Oncology.
J Mallen-St ClairSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
A S HoSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Samueli Institute · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Design of Cancer Phase I/II Clinical Trials Using Drug Combinations of Cytotoxic and Biologic AgentsR01CA188480 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI TIGHIOUART, MOURAD · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is standard for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients with positive margins or extranodal extension (ENE) following surgery. However, emerging evidence suggests the number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) is the dominant determinant of survival in non-oropharyngeal HNSCC and thus may better identify those benefiting from treatment intensification. Patients and methods: Patients from the National Cancer Database diagnosed with non-oropharyngeal HNSCC (oral cavity, larynx, hypopharynx) between 2004 and 2014 and undergoing surgical resection, neck dissection, and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) were included. Multivariable regression with first-order interaction terms was used to model the interaction between postoperative CRT and continuous number of positive LNs with respect to overall survival. Results: In total, 7144 patients met inclusion criteria. In multivariable analysis, increasing number of positive LNs was associated with both increasing mortality (P < 0.001) and increasing benefit from postoperative CRT versus RT alone (interaction P < 0.001). While there was no benefit from postoperative CRT in patients with 0-2 LN+ [hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.07, P = 0.47], increased benefit was seen in those with 3-5 LN+ (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.00, P = 0.05) and those with ≥6 LN+ (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82, P < 0.001) in multivariable models. By contrast, margin status and ENE did not reliably identify patients benefitting from postoperative CRT based on statistical tests of interaction. Even in patients with ENE, positive margins, or both, only those with ≥6 LN+ had improved survival with postoperative CRT. Conclusion: Increasing metastatic nodal burden was associated with increased benefit from CRT compared with RT alone, surpassing conventional high-risk factors in identifying patients benefiting from CRT. Stratification by metastatic LN number may characterize a very-high-risk patient cohort best suited for treatment intensification.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAgedChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID30395159
PMCPMC6336000
OpenAlexW2899710804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.