Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30394882›Full record

ArticleBehavioural pharmacology2018

Monoaminergic modulation of decision-making under risk of punishment in a rat model.

Shelby L Blaes, Caitlin A Orsini, Marci R Mitchell, Megan S Spurrell, Sara M Betzhold, Kenneth Vera, Jennifer L Bizon, Barry Setlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex differences in sensitivity to dopamine receptor manipulations of risk-based decision making in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reward/Punishment-Based Decision Making in Rodents.Current protocols in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shelby L BlaesDepartment of Psychiatry.
Caitlin A OrsiniDepartment of Psychiatry.
Marci R MitchellDepartment of Psychiatry.
Megan S SpurrellDepartment of Psychiatry.
Sara M BetzholdDepartment of Psychiatry.
Kenneth VeraDepartment of Psychiatry.
Jennifer L BizonDepartment of Psychiatry.
Barry SetlowDepartment of Psychiatry.

Funding

Risk taking and cocaine use: interactions, mechanisms, and therapeutic targetsR01DA036534 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Neural mechanism of enduring cocaine effects on impulsive choiceR01DA024671 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
Neural circuits and mechanisms underlying maladaptive risk-taking following cocaine self-administrationR00DA041493 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ORSINI, CAITLIN ANNE · 2019 to 2021
$745k
Neural circuits and mechanisms underlying maladaptive risk-taking following cocaine self-administrationK99DA041493 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ORSINI, CAITLIN ANNE · 2017 to 2018
$232k
Adolescent risk-taking, dopamine signaling, and cocaine: a vicious circleF31DA033074 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, MARCI R · 2012 to 2012
$14k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA033074NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA041493NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA041493NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024671NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to decide advantageously among options that vary in both their risks and rewards is critical for survival and well-being. Previous work shows that some forms of risky decision-making are robustly modulated by monoamine signaling, but it is less clear how monoamine signaling modulates decision-making under risk of explicit punishment. The goal of these experiments was to determine how this form of decision-making is modulated by dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine signaling, using a task in which rats choose between a small, 'safe' food reward and a large food reward associated with variable risks of punishment. Preference for the large, risky reward (risk-taking) was reduced by administration of a D2/3 dopamine receptor agonist (bromocriptine) and a selective D2 agonist (sumanirole). The selective D3 agonist PD128907 appeared to attenuate reward discrimination abilities but did not affect risk-taking per se. In contrast, drugs targeting serotonergic and noradrenergic signaling had few if any effects on choice behavior. These data suggest that in contrast to other forms of risky decision-making, decision-making under risk of punishment is selectively modulated by dopamine signaling, predominantly through D2 receptors.

Indexed as

PunishmentRisk-TakingAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAnimalsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideBiogenic MonoaminesConditioning, OperantDecision MakingDopamine AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugLocomotionMaleModels, AnimalRandom AllocationRatsRats, Long-EvansAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideBiogenic MonoaminesDopamine AgentsSerotonin Agents

Identifiers

PMID30394882
PMCPMC6291248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.