Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30394812›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2018

Histone modifications and the DNA double-strand break response.

Hieu T Van, Margarida A Santos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Histone Phosphorylation in DNA Damage Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mechanism of Histone Arginine Methylation Dynamic Change in Cellular Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Ex Vivo Expansion and Homing of Human Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hieu T Vana Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis , University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA.
Margarida A Santosa Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis , University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timely and precise repair of DNA damage, or more specifically DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) - the most deleterious DNA lesions, is crucial for maintaining genome integrity and cellular homeostasis. An appropriate cellular response to DNA DSBs requires the integration of various factors, including the post-translational modifications (PTMs) of chromatin and chromatin-associated proteins. Notably, the PTMs of histones have been shown to play a fundamental role in initiating and regulating cellular responses to DNA DSBs. Here we review the role of the major histone PTMs, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, methylation and acetylation, and their interactions during DNA DSB-induced responses.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsHistonesHumansHistoneschromatin MODIFICATIONSDNA damageHistones

Identifiers

PMID30394812
PMCPMC6342081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.