Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30394764›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2019

The experimental tobacco marketplace: Narrative influence on electronic cigarette substitution.

W Brady DeHart, Brent A Kaplan, Derek A Pope, Alexandra M Mellis, Warren K Bickel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. E-cigarette Price Impacts legal and Black-Market Cigarette Purchasing Under a Hypothetical Reduced-Nicotine Cigarette Standard.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development and Piloting Testing of an Experimental Tobacco and Nicotine Product Marketplace.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W Brady DeHartAddiction Recovery Research Center.
Brent A KaplanAddiction Recovery Research Center.
Derek A PopeAddiction Recovery Research Center.
Alexandra M MellisVirginia Tech.
Warren K BickelAddiction Recovery Research Center.

Funding

Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
Self-Control Improvement Intervention (SCII): Improving Abstinence in SmokersR01DA034755 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
National Institutes of HealthNCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034755Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite promising decreases in overall smoking rates, a significant proportion of the population continues to engage in this costly behavior. Substituting e-cigarettes for conventional cigarettes is an increasingly popular harm-reduction strategy. Narratives may be one method of increasing the substitutability of e-cigarettes. Participants (N = 160) were assigned to 1 of 4 narratives that described a close friend becoming ill. In the positive narrative, participants read about a friend that became ill but learned it was only the flu. In the negative narrative, the friend became ill from smoking cigarettes; in the negative

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdultCommerceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco Smoking

Identifiers

PMID30394764
PMCPMC6445377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.