ArticleIUBMB life2018
Mitonuclear epistasis, genotype-by-environment interactions, and personalized genomics of complex traits in Drosophila.
Article in IUBMB life, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of hypoxia and low temperature on female physiology and reproduction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Abundant Recurrent Mitochondrial Mutations and Widespread Mitonuclear Epistasis in Caenorhabditis elegans.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Mitochondrial Variation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii: Phylogeographic Legacy and Mitonuclear Associations With Metabolic Resistance to Pathogens and Insecticides.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Conservation Mitonuclear Replacement: Facilitated mitochondrial adaptation for a changing world.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Mitonuclear interactions shape both direct and parental effects of diet on fitness and involve a SNP in mitoribosomal 16s rRNA.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Genomic Signatures of Mitonuclear Coevolution in Mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Mitochondria as environments for the nuclear genome in Drosophila: mitonuclear G×G×E.The Journal of heredity · 2022Article
- The role of mitonuclear incompatibilities in allopatric speciation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
- Temperature-Specific and Sex-Specific Fitness Effects of Sympatric Mitochondrial and Mito-Nuclear Variation inInsects · 2022Article
- Mitonuclear mismatch alters nuclear gene expression in naturally introgressed Rhinolophus bats.Frontiers in zoology · 2021Article
- Extensive alternative splicing triggered by mitonuclear mismatch in naturally introgressed Rhinolophus bats.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Role of Mitonuclear Incompatibility in Bipolar Disorder Susceptibility and Resilience Against Environmental Stressors.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Mitochondrial-nuclear coadaptation revealed through mtDNA replacements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- Mitonuclear conflict and cooperation govern the integration of genotypes, phenotypes and environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Mapping and editing animal mitochondrial genomes: can we overcome the challenges?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
- Mitochondrial genomic variation drives differential nuclear gene expression in discrete regions of Drosophila gene and protein interaction networks.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- The cuticle inward barrier inPeerJ · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitochondrial function requires the coordinated expression of dozens of gene products from the mitochondrial genome and hundreds from the nuclear genomes. The systems that emerge from these interactions convert the food we eat and the oxygen we breathe into energy for life, while regulating a wide range of other cellular processes. These facts beg the question of whether the gene-by-gene interactions (G x G) that enable mitochondrial function are distinct from the gene-by-environment interactions (G x E) that fuel mitochondrial activity. We examine this question using a Drosophila model of mitonuclear interactions in which experimental combinations of mtDNA and nuclear chromosomes generate pairs of mitonuclear genotypes to test for epistatic interactions (G x G). These mitonuclear genotypes are then exposed to altered dietary or oxygen environments to test for G x E interactions. We use development time to assess dietary effects, and genome wide RNAseq analyses to assess hypoxic effects on transcription, which can be partitioned in to mito, nuclear, and environmental (G x G x E) contributions to these complex traits. We find that mitonuclear epistasis is universal, and that dietary and hypoxic treatments alter the epistatic interactions. We further show that the transcriptional response to alternative mitonuclear interactions has significant overlap with the transcriptional response to alternative oxygen environments. Gene coexpression analyses suggest that these shared genes are more central in networks of gene interactions, implying some functional overlap between epistasis and genotype by environment interactions. These results are discussed in the context of evolutionary fitness, the genetic basis of complex traits, and the challenge of achieving precision in personalized medicine. © 2018 The Authors. IUBMB Life published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 70(12):1275-1288, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.