Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30394643›Full record

ArticleIUBMB life2018

Mitonuclear epistasis, genotype-by-environment interactions, and personalized genomics of complex traits in Drosophila.

David M Rand, Jim A Mossman, Lei Zhu, Leann M Biancani, Jennifer Y Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUBMB life, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Signatures of Mitonuclear Coevolution in Mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of mitonuclear incompatibilities in allopatric speciation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mitonuclear conflict and cooperation govern the integration of genotypes, phenotypes and environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Mapping and editing animal mitochondrial genomes: can we overcome the challenges?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David M RandDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-3459
Jim A MossmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Lei ZhuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Leann M BiancaniDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jennifer Y GeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Nuclear-Mitochondrial Fitness Interactions in DrosophilaR01GM067862 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAND, DAVID M · 2004 to 2020
$5.1M
Mitochondrial Genetics of Aging in DrosophilaR01AG027849 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAND, DAVID M · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027849NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial function requires the coordinated expression of dozens of gene products from the mitochondrial genome and hundreds from the nuclear genomes. The systems that emerge from these interactions convert the food we eat and the oxygen we breathe into energy for life, while regulating a wide range of other cellular processes. These facts beg the question of whether the gene-by-gene interactions (G x G) that enable mitochondrial function are distinct from the gene-by-environment interactions (G x E) that fuel mitochondrial activity. We examine this question using a Drosophila model of mitonuclear interactions in which experimental combinations of mtDNA and nuclear chromosomes generate pairs of mitonuclear genotypes to test for epistatic interactions (G x G). These mitonuclear genotypes are then exposed to altered dietary or oxygen environments to test for G x E interactions. We use development time to assess dietary effects, and genome wide RNAseq analyses to assess hypoxic effects on transcription, which can be partitioned in to mito, nuclear, and environmental (G x G x E) contributions to these complex traits. We find that mitonuclear epistasis is universal, and that dietary and hypoxic treatments alter the epistatic interactions. We further show that the transcriptional response to alternative mitonuclear interactions has significant overlap with the transcriptional response to alternative oxygen environments. Gene coexpression analyses suggest that these shared genes are more central in networks of gene interactions, implying some functional overlap between epistasis and genotype by environment interactions. These results are discussed in the context of evolutionary fitness, the genetic basis of complex traits, and the challenge of achieving precision in personalized medicine. © 2018 The Authors. IUBMB Life published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 70(12):1275-1288, 2018.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionAnimalsCell NucleusDrosophila melanogasterEpistasis, GeneticGenome, MitochondrialGenomicsGenotypeHaplotypesHumansMitochondriaMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypePrecision Medicinecomplex diseasesevolutiongenetic variationgenomicsmitochondriatranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID30394643
PMCPMC6268205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.