ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Realistic 4D MRI abdominal phantom for the evaluation and comparison of acquisition and reconstruction techniques.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal MR Multitasking for radiotherapy treatment planning: A motion-resolved and multicontrast 3D imaging approach.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Phantoms for Quantitative Body MRI: a review and discussion of the phantom value.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Free-breathing and instantaneous abdominal TEuropean radiology · 2023Article
- Toward a realistic in silico abdominal phantom for QSM.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- 4D Golden-Angle Radial MRI at Subsecond Temporal Resolution.NMR in biomedicine · 2023Article
- Single projection driven real-time multi-contrast (SPIDERM) MR imaging using pre-learned spatial subspace and linear transformation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- An Anthropomorphic Digital Reference Object (DRO) for Simulation and Analysis of Breast DCE MRI Techniques.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- MRSIGMA: Magnetic Resonance SIGnature MAtching for real-time volumetric imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Realistic Dynamic Numerical Phantom for MRI of the Upper Vocal Tract.Journal of imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis work presents a 4D numerical abdominal phantom, which includes T
methodsThe 3D anatomical mesh models were non-rigidly scaled and shifted by respiratory motion derived from an in vivo scan. A time series of voxelized 3D abdominal phantom images were obtained with contrast determined by the tissue properties and pulse sequence parameters. Two example simulations: (1) 3D T
resultsThe proposed 4D abdominal phantom can successfully simulate images and MRI data with nonrigid respiratory motion and specific contrast settings and data sampling schemes. In example 1, the use of a numerical 4D abdominal phantom was demonstrated to aid in the comparison between different approaches for volumetric T
conclusionThis realistic abdominal MR phantom can be used to simulate different pulse sequences and data sampling schemes for the comparison of acquisition and reconstruction methods under controlled conditions that are impossible or prohibitively difficult to perform in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.