Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30394337›Full record

Trial reportJoint bone spine2019

Implication of nurse intervention on engagement with urate-lowering drugs: A qualitative study of participants in a RCT of nurse led care.

Zahira P Latif, Georgina Nakafero, Wendy Jenkins, Michael Doherty, Abhishek Abhishek

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Joint bone spine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zahira P LatifAcademic rheumatology, faculty of medicine & health sciences, school of medicine, university of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Rheumatology research group, institute of inflammation and ageing, university of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Georgina NakaferoAcademic rheumatology, faculty of medicine & health sciences, school of medicine, university of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Nottingham NIHR biomedical research centre, Nottingham, UK.
Wendy JenkinsAcademic rheumatology, faculty of medicine & health sciences, school of medicine, university of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Nottingham NIHR biomedical research centre, Nottingham, UK.
Michael DohertyAcademic rheumatology, faculty of medicine & health sciences, school of medicine, university of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Nottingham NIHR biomedical research centre, Nottingham, UK.
Abhishek AbhishekAcademic rheumatology, faculty of medicine & health sciences, school of medicine, university of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Nottingham NIHR biomedical research centre, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: Abhishek.abhishek@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 19703Versus Arthritis 21297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore patient perception of the role of a nurse-led complex package of care in facilitating engagement with urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) in the management of gout.

methodsThirty people who had participated in a randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of a nurse-led complex package of care for gout, were purposively sampled and interviewed between 18-26 months after the end of the trial. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a modified grounded-theory approach. Data were managed using Nvivo. STATA v15 was used to describe summary statistics.

resultsParticipants described their views and experiences of engaging with a nurse-led intervention designed to provide holistic assessment, individualised patient education, and involvement in shared decision-making for the long-term management of gout. The analysis revealed key themes in how nurse-led intervention facilitated engagement with ULT, namely by proving improved knowledge and understanding of gout and its treatment, involvement of patients in decision-making about treatment, and increased confidence about benefits from treatment. However, some treatment uncertainty and concern remained and one participant free of gout flares discontinued ULT, while another halved the dose after the end of the trial.

conclusionsThis study reports data on patient experience of engaging with ULT to manage gout after receiving nurse-led care. It demonstrates that shared decision-making and the joint efforts of fully informed practitioners and patients persuades patients to engage with ULTs, and that experiencing the benefits of curative treatment motivates them to maintain adherence.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAllopurinolDecision Making, SharedDrug MonitoringFemaleFranceGoutGout SuppressantsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNurse-Patient RelationsPatient SatisfactionPractice Patterns, Nurses'Qualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentAllopurinolGout SuppressantsUric AcidClinical inertiaGoutMedication adherenceNurse-led interventionTherapeutic educationUrate-lowering therapy

Identifiers

PMID30394337
PMCPMC6491495
OpenAlexW2898181568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.