Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30394299›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular probes2018

Reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification with lateral flow dipsticks for detection of influenza A virus and subtyping of H1 and H3.

Ning Sun, Weiping Wang, Jie Wang, Xinyue Yao, Fangfang Chen, Xiaojun Li, Yi Yinglei, Bo Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular probes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in the Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ning SunInstitute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Weiping WangInstitute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jie WangInstitute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xinyue YaoInstitute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Fangfang ChenInstitute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaojun LiInstitute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Department of Chemistry, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. Electronic address: zxsyk_9@163.com.
Yi YingleiShanghai Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Bo ChenNingbo Health BioMed Co., Ltd, Ning Bo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assays with lateral flow dipsticks (RT-RPA-LFD) were developed for identification of the matrix and hemagglutinin (HA) genes to detect influenza A virus and distinguish subtypes H1 and H3. Assessment of the assays' specificity showed that there was no cross-reactivity with other targets. Their limits of detection were 123.6 copies per reaction for the matrix gene, 677.1 copies per reaction for the H1 HA gene, and 112.2 copies/reaction for the H3 HA gene. Of 111 samples tested by RT-RPA-LFD assays, 27 were positive for influenza A virus, 14 were positive for H1, and 10 were positive for H3. Compared to the results obtained from real-time RT-PCR assays, the sensitivity of RT-RPA-LFD assays was 75%, 93.33% and 71.43% for the matrix, H1, and H3, with 100% specificity. The sensitivity of RT-RPA-LFD assays is lower than that of real-time RT-PCR, comparable or better than that of conventional RT-PCR, and much better than that of RIDTs. In conclusion, these assays offer an efficient and reliable tool for identification and subtyping of influenza A virus (subtype H1 and H3) in the resource-limited setting.

Indexed as

RheologyChildHumansInfluenza A virusMolecular TypingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRecombinasesRegression AnalysisReverse TranscriptionSensitivity and SpecificityRecombinasesDetectionInfluenza A virusLateral flow dipstickRecombinase polymerase amplificationSubtyping

Identifiers

PMID30394299
PMCPMC7127182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.