Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30393864›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2019

Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus.

Nazlı Tümer, Vahid Arbabi, Willem Paul Gielis, Pim A de Jong, Harrie Weinans, Gabrielle J M Tuijthof, Amir A Zadpoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Morphological analysis of ankle joint space width.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Symmetry of the left and right tibial plafond; a comparison of 75 distal tibia pairs.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Anthropomorphic Characterization of Ankle Joint.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Fibular diaphyseal curvature of the Jomon population.Anatomical science international · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Statistical shape model of the talus bone morphology: A comparison between impinged and nonimpinged ankles.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nazlı TümerDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3754-9630
Vahid ArbabiDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Willem Paul GielisDepartment of Orthopedics, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pim A de JongDepartment of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harrie WeinansDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Gabrielle J M TuijthofDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amir A ZadpoorDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bones forming the talocrural joint (TCJ) and subtalar joint (STJ) are often assumed to be bilaterally symmetric. Therefore, the contralateral limb (i.e. the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus) is used as a template or an intra-subject control in clinical and research practice. However, the validity of the symmetry assumption is controversial, because insufficient information is available on the shape variations and bilateral (a)symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus. Using three-dimensional spatially dense sampled representations of bone shapes extracted from bilateral computed tomography scans of 66 individuals (55 male, mean age: 61 ± 10 years; 11 female, mean age: 53 ± 15 years), we analyzed whether: (i) similar shape patterns exist in the left and right bones of the same type; (ii) gender has an effect on bone shape variations; (iii) intra-subject shape variation is smaller than that of inter-subject for a given shape variance direction. For the first set of analyses, all left and right instances of the same type of bone were considered as two separate groups, and statistically compared with each other on multiple aspects including group location (central tendency), variance-covariance scale (dispersion) and orientation (covariance structure) using distance-based permutational tests. For the second and third sets of analyses, all left and right bones of the same type were pooled into one group, and shape variations in the TCJ and STJ bones were extracted using principal component analysis. The effects of gender on age-adjusted bone shape differences were assessed using an analysis of covariance. Moreover, intra-class correlation was employed to evaluate intra- and inter-subject bone shape variations. For each bone type, both sides had similar shape patterns (P

Indexed as

AdultAgedCalcaneusFemaleFibulaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedTalusTibiaTomography, X-Ray Computedbilateral symmetrycalcaneusfibulasubtalar jointtalocrural jointtalustibia

Identifiers

PMID30393864
PMCPMC6284442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.