Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30393788›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering2017

Delirium Prediction using Machine Learning Models on Preoperative Electronic Health Records Data.

Anis Davoudi, Ashkan Ebadi, Parisa Rashidi, Tazcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Azra Bihorac, Alberto C Bursian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dynamic Delirium Prediction in the Intensive Care Unit using Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records.... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prediction of Prednisolone Dose Correction Using Machine Learning.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anis DavoudiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Ashkan EbadiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Parisa RashidiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Tazcan Ozrazgat-BaslantiDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Azra BihoracDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Alberto C BursianDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessmentR01GM110240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHR) are mainly designed to record relevant patient information during their stay in the hospital for administrative purposes. They additionally provide an efficient and inexpensive source of data for medical research, such as patient outcome prediction. In this study, we used preoperative Electronic Health Records to predict postoperative delirium. We compared the performance of seven machine learning models on delirium prediction: linear models, generalized additive models, random forests, support vector machine, neural networks, and extreme gradient boosting. Among the models evaluated in this study, random forests and generalized additive model outperformed the other models in terms of the overall performance metrics for prediction of delirium, particularly with respect to sensitivity. We found that age, alcohol or drug abuse, socioeconomic status, underlying medical issue, severity of medical problem, and attending surgeon can affect the risk of delirium.

Indexed as

Deliriumelectronic health recordmachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID30393788
PMCPMC6211171
OpenAlexW2783365325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.